• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Civ 4 any good?

yeah it is good game...the graphic is great and a lot of improvement over old civ series. I am glad I bought it 🙂
 
The game is good, but horribly bugged. Shame on the publisher for releasing it before it was properly tested for errors.
 
The demo totally sold me, but it's fallen into the "just another RTS" for me. Having said that, it's very addicting and unforgiving(I suck).
 
Originally posted by: oynaz
The game is good, but horribly bugged. Shame on the publisher for releasing it before it was properly tested for errors.

Yea, the developers weren't happy with it's condition upon rleease but the developer pushed it out anyway. It does have a little bit of a memory leak that crashes on some machines in the later stages of the game (on Huge/Large Maps) that still remains unresolved. You can get round it by not using those maps or lowering resolution/quality altho I deem that not very good.
 
Originally posted by: Imp
The demo totally sold me, but it's fallen into the "just another RTS" for me. Having said that, it's very addicting and unforgiving(I suck).

Kind of odd that it would fall into the "just another RTS" category considering its not a RTS game.
 
Originally posted by: skace
Game of 2005? I sure would hope it's good. The multiplayer on it's own is amazing.

The multiplayer is f*cking awesome. They definately did it right in this game. Definately get it if you like strategy games.

I think this game is a perfection of the Civ series.
 
Back
Top