Circumcized (sp?) Penis

Cynicism

Senior member
Apr 1, 2001
406
0
0
What is the difference from a medical or sexual standpoint of those that are circumcized and those that aren't?
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Non-circumcized
Medical: Your wee wee has a "hood" on the end
Sexually: It's not as clean, and the hood can rip
 

Siva

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2001
5,472
0
71
Drs used to think that an uncircumsized guy was more likely to get penis cancer. I think that was proven wrong. Otherwise the only difference would be the possiblility of smegma and appearence.
 

kami

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
17,627
5
81
Something tells me the majority of un-cut guys are 2 pump chumps ;)
 

Sluggo

Lifer
Jun 12, 2000
15,488
5
81
Some say that an un-cut is more sensitive, since it has the added friction of the foreskin rubbing over the head during....uhhhhh.... stimulation.

Are you more partial to Turtlenecks or T-shirts? :D
 

TripleJ

Platinum Member
Apr 29, 2001
2,667
0
0
Medically, it is meant to reduce the risk of cancer of the penis, but I don't think there has been much research done it.

Sexually, there are a huge amount of nerves in the foreskin so it could be said that one may be missing out on some pleasure.

Ethically, should we be circumcising when there is no factually known benefit of it?
 

EvanFerguson

Banned
May 14, 2001
956
0
0
if you've been snipped it's actually cleaner beast........

i guess it's like cleaning behind your ears kinda, but if you don't have an ear then it's prolly cleaner there or something......







uhhh, somethinglike that
 

TripleJ

Platinum Member
Apr 29, 2001
2,667
0
0
<<Something tells me the majority of un-cut guys are 2 pump chumps ;)>>


Hehe, give them a bit of 2-stroke and they're away! :p ;)
 

Siva

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2001
5,472
0
71


<< Sexually, there are a huge amount of nerves in the foreskin so it could be said that one may be missing out on some pleasure. >>


Actually I read something about guys later in life, having it done, saying it wasn't any less um, good, and some said it was better. Could be wrong though.
 

GasX

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
29,033
6
81
I thank the lucky stars that I wasn't ritually tortured when I was a baby.

My snake in a turtleneck is grateful too.
 

SSP

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
17,727
0
0


<< I thank the lucky stars that I wasn't ritually tortured when I was a baby.

My snake in a turtleneck is grateful too.
>>



Amen to that.
 

kami

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
17,627
5
81
Not to get too graphic, but I wonder if women still like to give fellatio on a uncircumsized guy? I just can't picture it...sorry if that gives any of you bad mental pictures. ;) Or can you uhh.. pull it back?


<---cut, so i don't know
 

Pastore

Diamond Member
Feb 9, 2000
9,728
0
76
Once a guy gets an erection, the foreskin is no longer visible... so dont worry about that...
 

Doctorweir

Golden Member
Sep 20, 2000
1,689
0
0
Circumsiced can do longer, because of being not so sensitive...:D

Am I starting a flame-war with this...:Q
 

kami

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
17,627
5
81


<< Once a guy gets an erection, the foreskin is no longer visible... so dont worry about that...
>>


hmm i always thought it was different, but then again how the hell would i know
 

Pastore

Diamond Member
Feb 9, 2000
9,728
0
76


<< hmm i always thought it was different, but then again how the hell would i know >>


yep, you are wrong, live and learn :p
 

SSP

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
17,727
0
0
kami... the foreskin is not visible if you have an erection. DUH! :D

EDIT - I'm too slow. :D
 

TuffGuy

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2000
6,478
0
76


<< Circumsiced can do longer, because of being not so sensitive...:D

Am I starting a flame-war with this...:Q
>>


and that's a good thing for the guy HOW?
 

kami

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
17,627
5
81


<< Circumsiced can do longer, because of being not so sensitive... >>


like i said... uncircumsized = 2 pump chump! :p;) that's what I hear at least. actually from a female friend of mine :Q