• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Circuit Problem: Nodal Analysis

jmcoreymv

Diamond Member
I have to find Vo in this circuit
here
using nodal analysis.

I cant seem to figure out how. I wrote the KCL equations at node V1:
(V1-Vo)/3 + (V1-3)/1 = (4Vo-V1)/5
The current through the 3 ohm and the 2 ohm resistor should be equal so I wrote (Vo-V1)/3 = -V0/2

I solve those and I always end up getting a different answer and I cant figure out what Im doing wrong. Any ideas?
 
Originally posted by: jmcoreymv
I have to find Vo in this circuit
here
using nodal analysis.

I cant seem to figure out how. I wrote the KCL equations at node V1:
(Vo-V1)/3 + (V1-3)/1 = (4Vo-V1)/5

The current through the 3 ohm and the 2 ohm resistor should be equal so I wrote (Vo-V1)/3 = -V0/2

I solve those and I always end up getting a different answer and I cant figure out what Im doing wrong. Any ideas?

you have to use nodal? You can solve with other stuff easily, but let me give this thing a try
 
Are you using a green circuits book called Intro to circuits for Computer and Electrical engineers? I think i did that same exact problem 2 nights ago, but i think i answered it wrong also.
 
The book is fundamentals of electric circuits, second edition. We dont learn mesh analysis till next week, and I have to learn to solve it with nodal because I know she will ask for it on the midterm.
 
I did a quick mesh analysis and came up with Vo = 30/29, I may have made a math mistake though as my RREF skills are somewhat lacking 😛
 
My friend came up with 6/5, Ive come up with 10/9 and various other fractions where the numerator is 1 more then the denominator.
 
Here are the formulas I got (it's been a while so I might totally off)

for Node V1: (V1 - V0)/2 + (V1 - 3) + (V1 - 4V0) / 5 = 0
for Node V0: (V0 - V1)/3 + (V0)/2 = 0

My answers:
V1 = 25/9
V0 = 10/9

let me double check, I hate my algebra
 
Originally posted by: Synergy
Here are the formulas I got (it's been a while so I might totally off)

for Node V1: (V1 - V0)/2 + (V1 - 3) + (V1 - 4V0) / 5 = 0
for Node V0: (V0 - V1)/3 + (V0)/2 = 0

My answers:
V1 = 25/9
V0 = 10/9

let me double check, I hate my algebra

Thats what I got...awesome.
 
I rechecked with nodal, 10/9th is right, lemme recheck my meshes. Found a sign mistake in my RREF, 10/9 is verified by mesh analysis as well.
 
Originally posted by: jmcoreymv
Originally posted by: Synergy
Here are the formulas I got (it's been a while so I might totally off)

for Node V1: (V1 - V0)/2 + (V1 - 3) + (V1 - 4V0) / 5 = 0
for Node V0: (V0 - V1)/3 + (V0)/2 = 0

My answers:
V1 = 25/9
V0 = 10/9

let me double check, I hate my algebra

Thats what I got...awesome.

Not even a thanks :frown:

oh well time for more HW :beer:
 
for Node V1: (V1 - V0)/2 + (V1 - 3) + (V1 - 4V0) / 5 = 0
for Node V0: (V0 - V1)/3 + (V0)/2 = 0

the (V1-3) part doesn't make any sense. basically when you
do node analysis you are doing currents going into or out of
the nodes. V1-3 itsn't a current so that equation is fud.

~bulls
 
Originally posted by: BullsOnParade
for Node V1: (V1 - V0)/2 + (V1 - 3) + (V1 - 4V0) / 5 = 0
for Node V0: (V0 - V1)/3 + (V0)/2 = 0

the (V1-3) part doesn't make any sense. basically when you
do node analysis you are doing currents going into or out of
the nodes. V1-3 itsn't a current so that equation is fud.

~bulls

When you do the equation for V1 - 3 you notice the ohm value 1 (V1 - 3)/1 so what is something over 1? Back to basics for you 😛
 
whoa..I totally don't remember how to do that.... graduated from EE in 2002, took circuits I back in 2000.... I better start studying for my PE now.

😱

after reading this thread, though, it came back to me a little bit.... never have to do anything like this at work though... thank goodness for ETAP and Aspen.
 
Back
Top