CIA officer fired over classified leak

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/MSNBC...fficer_fired_over_classified_0421.html
A CIA officer has been fired for leaking classified information to a Washington Post reporter.

Dana Priest won a Pulitzer Prize for reports revealing the existence of secret CIA prisons in Eastern Europe. The prisons are reportedly used for the interrogation of terrorism suspects.

The White House has repeatedly called that leak a threat to national security, often comparing it unfavorably to the "positive" leaks in connection to the outing of CIA operative Valerie Plame.

The agent fired reportedly placed numerous calls to Priest around the time of the prison leak, and failed a polygraph test when confronted. Criminal charges are reportedly possible.
It's ok to leak information re: a covert CIA operative and a front company protecting other intelligence agents but it's not ok to leak information about ILLEGAL activities??

We're definitely in Bizarro World.
 

johnnobts

Golden Member
Jun 26, 2005
1,105
0
71
Is there anything american you all care about?

Or is it just a race to totalitarism?

______

no, i hate america... please. i just happen to believe that keeping classified information during a time of war is important. not all "whistleblowers" are heroes.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
Originally posted by: johnnobts
Is there anything american you all care about?

Or is it just a race to totalitarism?

______

no, i hate america... please. i just happen to believe that keeping classified information during a time of war is important. not all "whistleblowers" are heroes.


So you dont think the public should know we have secret torture centers around the world while our government tells us we are the bringers of freedom the world should look up to?

That is VERY important, countries should not be doing this, unless they are some craphole third world dictatorship.

Who is going to stop the government when it steps out of line if the truth is not known?

These people take oaths to defend freedom, that trumps political matters such as saving rumsfelds torturing butt anytime.

Better a honest one of OUR guys get the truth out then have the world find out through rumors or another country stumbling into it. Good to know there are decent americans out there still willing to take a stand against injustices.

Of course fox spins it to cover bush regimes butt, fox is no less then bush's propaganda machine and we all know that.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,836
2,620
136
Ironically, the reporter to whom this story was leaked won the top prize in journalism (the Pulitzer Prize) for reporting this very story.

If the allegations are true, its pathetically ironic when a true patriot like this gets fired and faces potential criminal charges and this Bush awards the nation's top civilian award to the head of the CIA for its botched operations in 9/11 and thereafter.
 

jlmadyson

Platinum Member
Aug 13, 2004
2,201
0
0
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/politics/3811119.html


WASHINGTON ? In a highly unusual move, the CIA has fired an employee for leaking classified information to the news media, including details about secret CIA prisons in Eastern Europe that resulted in a Pulitzer Prize-winning story, officials said Friday.

The Associated Press has learned the officer was a CIA veteran nearing retirement, Mary McCarthy. Reached Friday evening at home, her husband would not confirm her firing.

In McCarthy's final position at the CIA, she was assigned to its Office of Inspector General, looking into allegations the CIA was involved in torture at Iraqi prisons, according to a former colleague who spoke on condition of anonymity because the case is under investigation.

Without identifying McCarthy by name, CIA Director Porter Goss announced the firing in a short message to agency employees circulated Thursday. Such firings are rare. And it is the first time since Goss took over in September 2004, vowing to clamp down on leaks, that he has dismissed an intelligence officer for speaking with reporters.

Agency spokesman Paul Gimigliano confirmed an officer had been fired for having unauthorized contacts with the media and disclosing classified information to reporters, including details about intelligence operations.

"The officer has acknowledged unauthorized discussions with the media and the unauthorized sharing of classified information," Gimigliano said. "That is a violation of the secrecy agreement that everyone signs as a condition of employment with the CIA."

Citing the Privacy Act, the CIA would not disclose any details about the officer's identity or what she might have told the news media. However, a law enforcement official confirmed there was a criminal leaks investigation under way, but it did not involve the fired CIA officer.

The official said the CIA officer had provided information that contributed to a Washington Post story last year disclosing secret U.S. prisons in Eastern Europe. The law enforcement official spoke only on condition of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the matter.

The Post's Dana Priest won a Pulitzer Prize this week for her reporting on a covert prison system set up by the CIA after Sept. 11, 2001, that at various times included sites in eight countries. The story caused an international uproar, and government officials have said it did significant damage to relationships between the U.S. and allied intelligence agencies.

Post Executive Editor Leonard Downie Jr. said on the newspaper's Web site, "We don't know the details of why (the CIA employee) was fired, so I can't comment on that. But as a general principle, obviously I am opposed to criminalizing the dissemination of government information to the press."

It was unclear if Priest or any other reporters who spoke to McCarthy would be brought into an investigation. Post spokesman Eric Grant said no reporter at the paper had been subpoenaed or had spoken to investigators about the matter.

Goss has pressed for aggressive probes about leaked information.

"The damage has been very severe to our capabilities to carry out our mission," Goss told Congress in February, adding that a federal grand jury should be impaneled to determine "who is leaking this information."

On Friday, another government official, also speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information, said the fired officer had failed a lie-detector test.

It was not clear if the person was taking a routine polygraph examination, as is required periodically of employees with access to classified information, or if the lie-detector test was among those ordered by Goss to find leakers inside the agency.

Justice Department officials declined to comment publicly on the firing and whether the matter had been referred to federal prosecutors for possible criminal charges. One law enforcement official said there were dozens of leak investigations under way. Another said there had been no referral from the CIA involving the fired employee, normally a precursor to a criminal investigation.

Both spoke on condition of anonymity because the matter is under investigation.
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: johnnobts
Is there anything american you all care about?

Or is it just a race to totalitarism?

______

no, i hate america... please. i just happen to believe that keeping classified information during a time of war is important. not all "whistleblowers" are heroes.

"Major combat operations in Iraq have ended..."

The war is OVER. We're in an occupation now, not a war.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: conjur
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/MSNBC...fficer_fired_over_classified_0421.html
A CIA officer has been fired for leaking classified information to a Washington Post reporter.

Dana Priest won a Pulitzer Prize for reports revealing the existence of secret CIA prisons in Eastern Europe. The prisons are reportedly used for the interrogation of terrorism suspects.

The White House has repeatedly called that leak a threat to national security, often comparing it unfavorably to the "positive" leaks in connection to the outing of CIA operative Valerie Plame.

The agent fired reportedly placed numerous calls to Priest around the time of the prison leak, and failed a polygraph test when confronted. Criminal charges are reportedly possible.
It's ok to leak information re: a covert CIA operative and a front company protecting other intelligence agents but it's not ok to leak information about ILLEGAL activities??

We're definitely in Bizarro World.

Link...
I suppose it all depends on whether or not you believe Bob Novak. But more and more it appears that trying to compare this action to the Plame investigation is becoming less and less accurate.
 

fallensight

Senior member
Apr 12, 2006
462
0
0
First the whole secret prisons thing is not and never ahd anything to do with Iraq, its about terrorism. Second, secret prisions violate a number of internantion law and treaties, to say nothing of what the foundations and ideals of what this country was founded on. Bush and his ilk just dont like thier criminal activites found out.
 

imported_Aelius

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2004
1,988
0
0
"That is a violation of the secrecy agreement that everyone signs as a condition of employment with the CIA."

This sort of statement reminds me of the confidentiality agreement Tobaco companies used to try to shut their own people up and not reveal the truth about their drug.

That's a crime but so are crimes against the Constitution. However now that the Supreme Court is stacked with Right Wing nut jobs, I wouldn't give this officer much of a chance.

One official called this a "damaging leak" that deals with operational information and said the fired officer "knowingly and willfully" leaked the information to the media and "was caught."

Jesus Christ they should be giving the officer a medal and a promotion, not throw him in jail. This sort of action sets a dangerous water mark for the future of the CIA or a lack thereof.

This crap reminds me of soldiers getting court martialed for shooting enemy soldiers before they had a chance to throw the grenades they had on them during Panama. Yeah that tells you all you need to know when facing the enemy. Shoot a bad guy and you go to prison. Brilliant.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: johnnobts
Is there anything american you all care about?

Or is it just a race to totalitarism?

______

no, i hate america... please. i just happen to believe that keeping classified information during a time of war is important. not all "whistleblowers" are heroes.

Of course some of them are...so how do you tell the difference? It's got to be more than what your political leaning happens to be.
 

imported_Aelius

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2004
1,988
0
0
Originally posted by: johnnobts
Is there anything american you all care about?

Or is it just a race to totalitarism?

______

no, i hate america... please. i just happen to believe that keeping classified information during a time of war is important. not all "whistleblowers" are heroes.

Classified... BS

They should take a copy of the Constitution and shove it directly down the throat of every moron in government who thinks this in situations like this.
 

maddogchen

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2004
8,903
2
76
Whistleblowers know the risks they are taking. Seriously, do you really expect to keep your job after revealing something like this? The person did the right thing though.
 

imported_Shivetya

Platinum Member
Jul 7, 2005
2,978
1
0
There is a big difference between being a whistleblower and what she was doing.

People working in her industry know they are under special conditions and must exercise great restraint before taking actions that can jeopardize national security and the lives of others.

Now the interesting angles are.
1. Was she fed information to see if she would reveal it? It is common to only provide certain individuals specific information so that it can be more readily traced should it get out. Something had to tip the CIA and investigators off about her.

2. Was she motivated by political affiliation? I damn well hope not, however if she was they should put her under the jail.

3. Is the information she revealed true? If so did anyone lose their life over it? Again, if this happened then put her under the jail.



Yeah I am a little miffed. I have a friends and even an ex-brother in law who work in this type of environment and none would ever do anything to risk the lives of others by divulging information which is not theirs to decide or give.

 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Classified information is classified information, whether this leak, the Plame leak, or bush telling cheney to tell Libby to leak information BEFORE it was declassified so he could sell his bogus, unprovoked attack against Iraq.

If you don't agree then you are promoting a double standard and that double standard is why America is in the mess it's in today. Hold EVERYONE accountable to the SAME standards or you get a society where a very few high government officials rule like royalty while the rest of us are forced to pay for their blunders.

 

imported_Aelius

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2004
1,988
0
0
Some people are freaking thick skulled.

This does not compare to the Plame leak at all.

Plame leak was a political ploy to undermine a critic. Nothing more. It had no positive effect for the people or the Constitution.

However in this case they are breaking the law and shredding the values of the Constitution and it was leaked.

They should be naming a government building after her, not put her in jail.