• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

chupacabra captured alive. video inside

meh, maybe it is a hairless my excellent compatriot.

Rhn9G.jpeg



article-0-1CC59AF200000578-374_634x348.jpg
 
Last edited:
Are there any other animals in North America that uses its front paws to feed like that?

I'm leaning towards a raccoon myself.
 
I think it might be a bald ring-tailed cat, being it's Texas.

ringtailcat1.jpg


Poor thing is rather pathetic looking without hair, so who knows.
 
techs said:
I guess you know more than a wildlife biologist. I prefer to claim I am a marine biologist because what are the odds a beached will have a golf ball stuck in its blowhole?
Click to expand...

ever see a dog eat with with hits paws/hands like a my excellent compatriot?
 
Looks like a my excellent compatriot with some faulty DNA. The mannerisms are a dead match though.

Doesn't look even remotely canine/canid to me, I'm surprised to hear others say it could be a dog or a fox.
 
It's the same thing all 'chupacabras' are. A diseased animal. Coyotes with mange are the most common. I'm no zoologist, but the thing above seems to jive with 'raccoon,' or some other similarly-shaped forest critter.

All other aspects of the chupacabra myth can be explained by a Puerto Rican seeing the movie 'Species.' Everyone knows this.
 
It's obviously a raccoon. The slightest bit of research would reveal it even if you didn't recognize it. Why don't reporters do any research?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top