WelshBloke
Lifer
- Jan 12, 2005
- 33,370
- 11,517
- 136
It never occurred to her to say, "i recant my Christianity?"
What would you do if you were in that situation. Say "I recant my [religious / non-religious convictions]"?
Well as our liberals friends would say:
You have freedom of religion, but you don't have freedom from the consequences of practicing your religion.
In other words: Good hang :thumbsup:
I'd be totally "Your elegant and persuasive argument has swayed my opinions on this. Yours is truly an enlightened religion, I'd be honoured to be part of it. Alla akbar and stuff. By the way where's the airport?"
Just with less sarcasm.
First off, this would actually NOT be freedom of religion you vastly stupid fuck.
Hey - how about an Official Islamic Fundamentalist Thread? Like what you have on police and law enforcement?
According to liberals it is. Liberals have no problem getting people fired for exposing Christian beliefs. Freedom of religion. Not freedom from the consequences.
Seems like you are just butt-hurt that Sudan has the balls to do what you dream of doing.
Hey - How about an Official Newell Steamer Trolling Thread? That way he could post in that thread instead of crapping on other threads.
Once again you have problems understanding the difference between consequences for beliefs versus consequences for actions.
A Sudanese court has sentenced a Christian woman to death for renouncing Islam, her lawyer said Thursday. Meriam Yehya Ibrahim, 27, was convicted by a Khartoum court this week of apostasy, or the renunciation of faith.
She also was convicted of adultery.
Once again you have problems understanding the difference between consequences for beliefs versus consequences for actions. You can't be fired for loving toasters, but you can be fired if your boss walks in on you in the break room and catches you with your dick stuck in a toaster.
Renouncing is an action.
Adultery is an action.
I was responding to your post that I quoted which referenced people being fired, I was not condoning what's mentioned in the OP. I mean, I quoted your post, how is this hard to understand?
He was fired for actions related to his faith.
This woman is being hanged for actions related to her faith.
What is hard for you to understand?
The only difference between liberals and Sudan is that Sudan has balls.
Christians do the same thing. http://www.thewire.com/politics/201...s-that-wont-discriminate-against-gays/370872/
First of all, who is "he" and wtf are you talking about?
Second, only you could compare a private company firing an individual to a government putting someone to death. It's absurd.
He was fired for actions related to his faith.
This woman is being hanged for actions related to her faith.
What is hard for you to understand?
The only difference between liberals and Sudan is that Sudan has balls.
wtf dude thats not even remotely close to being the same thing.
I would support that and also think we should start a "nehalem says something that anyone capable of rational thought would consider remarkably stupid" thread. Seeing as that's pretty much every post he makes. At least if Newell decreased his frequency of trolling it wouldn't be so bad. I have less of a problem with trolls than with people who are near brain dead stupid while also being that rare truly evil individual.
Liberals engaged in a witch hunt to get the CEO of Mozilla fired for opposing same-sex marriage.
Sudan is hanging a woman for renouncing Islam.
Fundamentally liberals and Sudan are saying the same thing. Don't engage in counter-revolutionary actions or you will face dramatic consequences.
