• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Christ the Lord: Out of Egypt

UbiSunt

Senior member
I'm about halfway through and paln on wrapping it up before lunch. This is a rather interesting book on its own merits. This book is almost certainly going to generate a great deal of controversy, but probably between Christians.

The reason that I say that is that the last major series of books that had a decidely Christian core were the "Left Behind" series. Those books were written for Protestants by Protestants and it showed, with the Pope becoming a Baptist before he dies in the first book. That is not to say that a substantial number of Catholics bought the book, but anyway.

What sets Rice's book apart (so far) is that she has maintained surprisingly close to Catholic orthodoxy, especially in regard to Mary's perpetual virginity or Aeiparthenos. (Spoilers?) Rice writes that James was Jesus' stepbrother and son of Joseph from a previous marriage (his wife had died) before his famous marriage to Mary. Rice further explains the confusion by giving Jesus two aunts named Mary and relegating Jesus' siblings, as the Protestants argue, into cousins.

However, this book is in no way some hardcore Catholic propaganda as some who have never cracked the book are charging. Rice uses a substantial amount from the Gnostic gospels, an issue that turned me off because most people's "education" concerning this began with the "Da Vinci Code". Rice does not, not yet, use the gnostic gospels as some sort of conspiracy theory but rather as a narrative filler in the same way that Mel Gibson supplemented the "Passion of the Christ" with Anna Catherine Emmerich's visionary account of the life of Jesus Christ.

Anyway, I recommend this book to anyone but please don't swallow this hook line and sinker. This is a fictional account of a sparsely documented life and it is the author's perogative to fill in those gaps.
 
I'm waiting for that twist, but not yet.

I'm sure the book, or the sequels, will get very interesting once satan appears.

So I guess nobody has read the book?

What gets me the angriest about this work is that there are no scholarly book reviews, at all. I have written several, but everything that I have encountered is the same repetitive BS restating what happens in the first chapter. I'm starting to think that Knopf simply provided the first chapter early and bought off everyone for a good review.

Every review restates the instance of Jesus striking a bully dead and then resurrecting him and an instance where brings clay pigeons to life. The latter is a brief anecdote that has little importance to the plot. Not one has addressed the issue of the Archleus' massacre at the temple in Jerusalem, the issue of Mary's perpetual virginity, etc.

Honestly, I believe this is another example of a major publishing company acting completely and utterly dishonestly.
 
Two people, (akubi doesn't count) have an opinion in all of ATOT? I figured this post would trigger a flame war; guess not.
 
So this book mixes Catholic interpretations of Biblical events with vampires?

So long as all the vampy stuff happens around the Biblical events rather than participating or altering them then, heck, sounds cool.
 
I've been a long time fan of Anne Rice's books, but I don't think I'll be picking this one up, which will be the first time since I first read An Interview with a Vampire in the mid ?80s. I think Mrs. Rice has forgotten who her audience is. If she wanted to please me she would have written the sequel to Ramses the Damned. It is never a good idea to leave a story unfinished.
 
Originally posted by: Papagayo
So, is James the vampire? Is Lestat going to become jesus?


I'm confused..

😉
If anything John the Baptist would be the vampire and you know who would be the other. 😉
 
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
So this book mixes Catholic interpretations of Biblical events with vampires?

So long as all the vampy stuff happens around the Biblical events rather than participating or altering them then, heck, sounds cool.

No, it would seem that Mrs. Rice has given up writing about Vampires, witches, and other occult subjects and is now focusing on proselytism.

Her most recent book is a fictionalized account of the pre-teen years of Christ.
 
Back
Top