buckshot24
Diamond Member
- Nov 3, 2009
- 9,916
- 85
- 91
Is %47 of the country on food stamps?
47/313=15%
If we posted every time Chris Matthews had a breakdown, we could start a whole new sub forum. LOLIf we posted every time some cable tv pundit hack had a breakdown, we could start a whole new sub forum.
Holy crap, 15%? Wow.About 15% of the country is on food stamps.
I errored again 47 million souls
That looks like a marketing slide for a video card.
MSNBC is way more of a damn joke than Fox. They don't even pretend, not even at all, to not be completely sh*t-nosed sycophants for the democrating party, shills to a degree that would make Hannity blush. Ok, not Hannity, that guy is MSNBC material, but they are awful.
Mathews is a blow hard drunk.Never seen Mathews tell a lie to make his point. I always put his "bias" down to his recognition of how radical the Right has become and him being old school enough to be appalled by the Right's current conduct in politics. He uses facts to back up what he has to say, though you may disagree with his conclusions.
Anyway, the corporatocracy now wants Romney to win; I'm glad too. It will be much easier to criticize a white Mormon Republican Administration about the illegal wars, czars, executive orders, lobbyists, bank backdoors, price-fixing, rampant corruption, judicial activism etc etc.
That's because that's what real criticism looks like and it will be coming from the left like it has been. What's the criticism been like from the right? Speaking "black" while giving a speech at a church? Using TelePrompTers? Not being a real citizen? A lack of school transcripts? Being lazy? Being socialist?
I could go on but I think you get the point.
The fact that you think msnbc is the equivalent to fox tells me you don't watch either channel.
Both are biased and both have their issues but they aren't equal.
For four years I've been asking for real criticism of Obama from the right and I got nothing but BS elementary school crap like I previously mentioned.
We just had a thread during the RNC where a lot of people claimed Chris Matthews was just as tough on his Democrat guests.
That's because that's what real criticism looks like and it will be coming from the left like it has been. What's the criticism been like from the right? Speaking "black" while giving a speech at a church? Using TelePrompTers? Not being a real citizen? A lack of school transcripts? Being lazy? Being socialist?
I could go on but I think you get the point.
The fact that you think msnbc is the equivalent to fox tells me you don't watch either channel.
Both are biased and both have their issues but they aren't equal.
For four years I've been asking for real criticism of Obama from the right and I got nothing but BS elementary school crap like I previously mentioned.
I don't know which video I like the Most . I think this one . It truely exposes the fact he doesn't belong in a NEWS ROOM
http://leanforward.msnbc.com/_news/...onspiracy-theory-but-i-dont-take-it-back?lite
Chris matthews needs to be kicked off the air along with the rest of msnbc
Why do you hate the free market?
Nice gotcha attempt.Why do you hate the free market?
Nice gotcha attempt.
Fails though because expressing an opinion on one particular product (in this case Mathews) isn't an admission that one hates the free market itself.
Maybe next time
Hate manifests itself in many ways. The storefront windowdressed reasons to justify it is an afterthought, brought to us by the likes of FOX, Limbaugh, Coulter, Hannity, O'Reilly et al. I do realize that in an effort to gain market share, the liberal media will, on occasion, go overboard to make a point, but not anything like the aforementioned "conservative" pundits who quite franky, always appear to be frantic, theatrical and excessively "passionate" in their delivery. Like the saying goes, if you got a weak point to make you need to make it in a very loud, incessant voice.
With that, false equivalency, a tool so often used in this forum, is just another way to make one side appear just as bad as another, which, ironically, logically points to the side that wants to drag the opposition down to their level of existence, politically speaking.