Originally posted by: MX2times
Another pro for top floor. No worries of first floor window break-ins, in most cases anyway.
Originally posted by: Xpred
I was looking at apartments, and there are rooms that are currently available. One is on the 2nd floor (highest) and one is on the 1st floor. In terms of wanting to reducing as much noise as possible, would it be better to live on the 1st floor or the 2nd? I was thinking if I were on the 2nd floor, I wouldn't have to hear footsteps or things above me. However say if I were to sleep on the 1st floor, I can't hear anything below me because there is none...what do you guys think? Oh yeah, I'll be living in an area where it is only one bed-bath complexes (Singles, I'm living by myself, and the people around me are also or max of 2 people); so I guess that should reduce a little bit even more noise, eh?
Originally posted by: audiotherapy
i live bottom but this fat fvck above me has feet made out of concrete and he loves to walk around all the time.oh yeah that guy is a nutcase too, i can hear him yelling to himself in the bathroom
and the freaking high cost of living in california i can't afford a townhouse any time soon 🙁
Originally posted by: rudder
I had an apartment where the lady above me would shower at 5:00 a.m. every morning. She had to be using the shower in unatural ways because the noise disturbed me so. Luckily my son is a well to do lawyer so I had him sue her.
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Top floor is best, but on the other hand, cooling costs are more since heat rises.