- Jan 20, 2001
- 10,737
- 0
- 0
Nukes . . . what nukes?
It was always obvious this was going to happen. If China refuses to get tough with the toadstool dictator with no resources living on its doorstep, did anyone in their right mind believe they would go along with sanctions against Iran?
It was always obvious this was going to happen. If China refuses to get tough with the toadstool dictator with no resources living on its doorstep, did anyone in their right mind believe they would go along with sanctions against Iran?
No way, a government that says one thing one day and something totally different a week later?BEIJING (Reuters) - China and
Iran expressed support on Thursday for a Russian proposal to resolve Tehran's nuclear standoff, and both said they opposed the threat of sanctions from the
U.N. Security Council.
---
He (Iranian) told later told Reuters that Iran was willing to show flexibility on the issue, but rejected the "language of force," an apparent reference to the threat of sanctions.
---
But China said U.N. sanctions would only complicate matters.
"We oppose impulsively using sanctions or threats of sanctions to solve problems," Kong said.
The comments seemed to contradict the message China gave U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick, who left China on Wednesday after a three-day visit.
I think its safe to say the US has ZERO pull in China. I wonder if the whole "you can't own our oil companies" thing has any impact?Zoellick gave a positive assessment of China's role in the nuclear stand-off, saying Washington and Beijing had no major differences on the issue. Kong, the Chinese spokesman, declined to directly endorse that assessment, simply repeating Beijing's general stance.