their attack on the fundamental right for a person to choose what to do with their own bodies? (you see, that's how I see it; yes, this requires that my understanding of conception is entirely different form theirs; and as a biologist, I tend to think that I have more functional knowledge than the typical pro-lifer) and by "not entirely that," I refer to other financial support outside of his pro-life views.
but you can keep going with this dickhole of an argument all you want; I'm going to stop here. Care all you want about why or why not I choose to do something, I could give two shits.
This thread is about chicken.
A true "fundamental right" pre-exists a government's legal recognition of it. Many people believe that it is circular reasoning to claim that this "right" over another "body" exists just because of Roe v. Wade. If you believe that one exists here, you must ask yourself: Is the fetus not also entitled to the same right? Why and, most importantly, when? That is what it boils down to and drawing the line earlier than that (@"fundament right") is just ignoring the true issue being debated. Any time someone makes it out to be a purely religious vs. intelligence argument, I know that they have ignorantly made up their minds and are refusing to acknowledge the true position of the other side so that they can insult and belittle them instead of having true, meaningful, constructive, discussion.
So, according to you, science doesn't say that conception is the point at which an individual like, say, you or I, first became an individual with a protected human life. It doesn't say that birth is either. Both are non-arbitrary points in a human's development, but the point where "birth" occurs and life continues can happen over a large range of the child's development, so you can see why that would be the controversial "non-arbitrary point" to choose. An arbitrary choice would be between, say, just randomly choosing between second and third trimester without any specific developmental event to classify it as a protected human life with rights of its own.