Originally posted by: Lemon law
Hillary is a centrist--too namby pamby to get the rational excited---Cheney is an extremist--and #1 advocate for Iraq and other extreme causes.
When and if events PROVE Cheney wrong---he will be finished as a candidate--caught betting the family farm on a losing horse--Hillary has not taken any extreme
stands---and is likely to weather the unpredictable far better.
Except few people think rationally about Hillary. It seems that half the country thinks she's a wild-eyed radical. But she's not.
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Cheney is a vicious and corrupt indivual---but understands using any means to gain an end---and his arguements are begiling but logically flawed---he plays well to the GOP faithful,
scaring all with doomday predictions---but he will look like a hell of a fool if Al-Quida ever does attack the US again--which would be childs play for any terrorist organization, given how little has actually been done by homeland security.
Actually, sad though it may be, I bet the country would huddle even closer under the Republican wing if we were attacked again. Suddenly all that mess about fearmongering, torturing people, illegal wiretaps, and declaring war everywhere will start to look like an attempt to fix the problem, whereas the Democrats will be "weak on terror". *shudder*