Atreus21
Lifer
- Aug 21, 2007
- 12,001
- 571
- 126
Originally posted by: CitizenKain
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: sportage
I posted this (below) in another thread. Meant to post it in this thread. Damm the drugs...
Isn?t it funny how any issue that effects someone personal is an issue they can agree with?
Cheney supporting same sex marriage, Nancy Reagan supporting stem cell research.
How would you explain opposing an issue, until it hits home?
Allowing ballot votes on civil rights issues should never be allowed unless
the voter has been there, done that. Like with Cheney, only if you have
someone in your family you can relate to for reality and not information
mostly from paid negative ad's.
"Will of the people" should never decide legal and civil rights issues.
The public are too easily fooled into believing non truths.
And they don't know law.
It?s time for same sex to be addressed on a federal level by the US supreme court, and passed on a federal national level, all states from shore to shore.
And thus put the matter, just as with civil rights in the 1960's, to a final rest.
In other words, it's time for a change. We need to ruled by a benevolent dictator, who will protect us. Not give the people what they want, but what they ought to want.
Is that right?
I wonder if you would have been this upset at the Civil Rights Act or the 19th Amendment.
Neither of which were implemented by the Supreme Court.
