Cheating wife gets millions in divorce

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
*She was married when she met her current husband
*She had an affair with her Husband once and he found out
*She had another affair with a married man a few years later and he found out

What is wrong with this woman? Why in the world is the court rewarding her anything? I hate this legal system. She didn't even make any of that money. She deserves maybe $100,000 at the most to get on her feet and move on. Apparently this judge has never been in a relationship before.

------------------------------------------

BRIDGEPORT, Connecticut (AP) -- A judge has awarded the former wife of a multimillionaire businessman a divorce settlement worth more than $40 million even though she admitted having affairs with her rock-climbing guide and a man she met on a flight to China.

In addition to a $24 million payment, Susan Sosin will keep the couple's $3.6 million Manhattan apartment, $2 million Utah ski house and $800,000 home in Wallkill, New York. But she has to vacate the couple's two mansions in Connecticut and three desert properties in Arizona.

In the divorce granted Wednesday, she also gets to keep $6 million in her brokerage accounts, eight cars and $2.9 million in jewelry, including a ruby piece her husband had bought for her but hadn't given to her prior to their divorce.

Richard Albrecht, attorney for Sosin's husband, Howard, estimated the total value of the award at $43 million, or 27 percent of the estate. She wanted half, he said.

"My opinion is her conduct in this matter affected the award," Albrecht said.

Susan Sosin's lawyer, Frederic J. Siegel, estimated the total value of the award was about $45 million and said his client asked for about 45 percent of the estate.

"By anybody's standards, it's a large amount of money," Siegel said. "Both parties will be able to move on with their lives."

Siegel said both sides were at fault for the divorce and defended his client as a good mother.

Howard Sosin, 54, who founded AIG Financial Products in 1987, filed for divorce after discovering his wife's relationships in February 2003. During an upgrade of their computer system, he found hundreds of e-mails between his wife and her lover, according to testimony.

Susan Sosin, 51, admitted in testimony that she had become intimate with a guide while rock climbing in 1996, though she said it was a spontaneous and isolated occurrence. During a flight to China in 2000, she met a married man, and that led to a lengthy affair, according to testimony.

"The parties' marriage has been undeniably marred by the defendant's infidelity," Superior Court Judge Howard Owens stated in his verdict. "Although her sexual relationship was not the sole cause of the breakdown, it did effectively terminate the marriage."

Howard Sosin's wealth was estimated at $168 million. Among the assets he gets to keep are $89 million in bank accounts, 10 of the couple's 18 cars, $960,000 worth of private club memberships and $22 million in fine art.

The couple met in 1978 when Howard Sosin was an assistant professor at Columbia University. At the time, she was married to another man and working in retail.

Howard Sosin served as the president and chief operating officer of AIG Financial Products until 1993 when he left the company. Following litigation, he received $182 million from AIG.
 

Brackis

Banned
Nov 14, 2004
2,863
0
0
Equally as rediculous is how someone could make nearly $200,000,000 from a company like that.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
And here I've always been told prostitution is illegal. She just got paid a lot for having sex with other men.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Bastard deserved it for finding a way to screw AIG out of 182 million dollars.. Karma works its power in mysterious ways...
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Bastard deserved it for finding a way to screw AIG out of 182 million dollars.. Karma works its power in mysterious ways...

How he earned his money is irrelevant, as this settlement continues to perpetuate the precedent of men being exploited in divorce cases.

If a man makes $40M a year or $40k a year, if the cause of divorce is due to his infidelity, his former wife can use that against him to claim a bigger piece of the pie.

However, if a woman engages in infidelity, it seems to have little to no bearing on the divorce preceedings.

Now I understand that the laws that exist today, and their precedents, are in response to the poor treatment of women since the founding of our nation...with the intended purpose being to move the pendulum from a male dominated society to more of an gender neutral equitable society.

However, when it comes to divorce, the pendulum has swung to far into the woman's court.

Big woop. He should have signed a pre-nup.
And what necessitates the pre-nuptial...a system so stacked against men that they have to protect their assets from gold-digging whores.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
Bastard deserved it for finding a way to screw AIG out of 182 million dollars.. Karma works its power in mysterious ways...

How he earned his money is irrelevant, as this settlement continues to perpetuate the precedent of men being exploited in divorce cases.

If a man makes $40M a year or $40k a year, if the cause of divorce is due to his infidelity, his former wife can use that against him to claim a bigger piece of the pie.

However, if a woman engages in infidelity, it seems to have little to no bearing on the divorce preceedings.

Now I understand that the laws that exist today, and their precedents, are in response to the poor treatment of women since the founding of our nation...with the intended purpose being to move the pendulum from a male dominated society to more of an gender neutral equitable society.

However, when it comes to divorce, the pendulum has swung to far into the woman's court.

Big woop. He should have signed a pre-nup.
And what necessitates the pre-nuptial...a system so stacked against men that they have to protect their assets from gold-digging whores.

I do agree with everything you said... But.. Maybe she was doing the Judge too :)
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
Bastard deserved it for finding a way to screw AIG out of 182 million dollars.. Karma works its power in mysterious ways...

How he earned his money is irrelevant, as this settlement continues to perpetuate the precedent of men being exploited in divorce cases.

If a man makes $40M a year or $40k a year, if the cause of divorce is due to his infidelity, his former wife can use that against him to claim a bigger piece of the pie.

However, if a woman engages in infidelity, it seems to have little to no bearing on the divorce preceedings.

Now I understand that the laws that exist today, and their precedents, are in response to the poor treatment of women since the founding of our nation...with the intended purpose being to move the pendulum from a male dominated society to more of an gender neutral equitable society.

However, when it comes to divorce, the pendulum has swung to far into the woman's court.

Big woop. He should have signed a pre-nup.
And what necessitates the pre-nuptial...a system so stacked against men that they have to protect their assets from gold-digging whores.

I thought conservatives were into personal responsibility? If you marry a gold-digging whore without getting a pre-nup, shame on you. And the system is not stacked. If you marry someone, there are serious consequences. But from what I hear the red states have a lot of problems with marriage, despite the fact they claim to respect it so much. ;)
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,684
136
What a collection of simplistic tard-like responses. They met in 1978, while she was married to another guy, and have been together over 20 years.... hhhmmm... I don't suppose that Sosin didn't boff another guy's wife at the time, did he? nahh.... probably waited, the sanctity of marriage, and all that... He probably thought she was a virgin, right?

Of course, nobody wants to recognize that being a good corporate exec wifey is a job in and of itself, or that relationships change over time, and are often more complex than near adolescents have any means to appreciate... Maybe their sexlife died a decade ago... unfortunately, it happens, and can be impossible to reconcile...

She got almost half? And? There's supposed to be something wrong with that, particularly considering the source and amount of their moola? The length of their relationship?

Yeh, I'm sure he's suffering terribly, probably have to get a part time job at Walmart to cover his ass.... Call the Wahmbulance, quick...
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
The key part of the article:

The couple met in 1978 when Howard Sosin was an assistant professor at Columbia University. At the time, she was married to another man and working in retail.

Cavet Emptor
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
What a collection of simplistic tard-like responses. They met in 1978, while she was married to another guy, and have been together over 20 years.... hhhmmm... I don't suppose that Sosin didn't boff another guy's wife at the time, did he? nahh.... probably waited, the sanctity of marriage, and all that... He probably thought she was a virgin, right?

Of course, nobody wants to recognize that being a good corporate exec wifey is a job in and of itself, or that relationships change over time, and are often more complex than near adolescents have any means to appreciate... Maybe their sexlife died a decade ago... unfortunately, it happens, and can be impossible to reconcile...

She got almost half? And? There's supposed to be something wrong with that, particularly considering the source and amount of their moola? The length of their relationship?

Yeh, I'm sure he's suffering terribly, probably have to get a part time job at Walmart to cover his ass.... Call the Wahmbulance, quick...
Ah, the good old 'I'm obviously right, so the rest of you must be retarded!' argument. Not surprising coming from you.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,655
6,222
126
Hmm, don't see what the fuss is about. Not like she married the guy 6 months ago and had 2 affairs within that period. The total amount she received is also immaterial.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,684
136
I hadn't noticed much actual argument, cyclo, mostly snide comments, like your own, and woman-bashing in general- you're welcome to make any argument at all, if that suits you...
 

Brackis

Banned
Nov 14, 2004
2,863
0
0
Originally posted by: Phokus
The key part of the article:

The couple met in 1978 when Howard Sosin was an assistant professor at Columbia University. At the time, she was married to another man and working in retail.

Cavet Emptor

Caveat bad latin spelling.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
I hadn't noticed much actual argument, cyclo, mostly snide comments, like your own, and woman-bashing in general- you're welcome to make any argument at all, if that suits you...
It was your argument I was referring to. Your typical 'I'm right so you're an idiot if you disagree' spew. You made some good points, but they're dwarfed by the jackassery that prefaces them.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,684
136
From Cyclo-

"It was your argument I was referring to. Your typical 'I'm right so you're an idiot if you disagree' spew. You made some good points, but they're dwarfed by the jackassery that prefaces them."

So, I called you and the others on your snide chauvinism, and now you're offended- Boo hoo- Wahmbulance for you, too, sir?
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
From Cyclo-

"It was your argument I was referring to. Your typical 'I'm right so you're an idiot if you disagree' spew. You made some good points, but they're dwarfed by the jackassery that prefaces them."

So, I called you and the others on your snide chauvinism, and now you're offended- Boo hoo- Wahmbulance for you, too, sir?
I'm not offended, just pointing out how ridiculous you are and why it's unlikely anyone will ever listen to you. You can't make any points without being condescending in the extreme. If my joke makes me a chauvinist, then so be it.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
thought conservatives were into personal responsibility? If you marry a gold-digging whore without getting a pre-nup, shame on you. And the system is not stacked. If you marry someone, there are serious consequences. But from what I hear the red states have a lot of problems with marriage, despite the fact they claim to respect it so much.

This entire nation is struggling with the concept of marriage, regardless of political ideology or religious beliefs. Yes marriage is supposed to have significance in the eyes of God if you are a person of faith, but even the Red States have shifted to a secularism of sorts when it comes to marriage.

As a conservative I am into personal responsibility. However, in this case, I believe the responsibility falls on the wife...she failed to honor her marriage vows, and as such, the personal responsibility she should accept is not benefitting from the contract of marriage that she of her own free will violated.