Bills say Smith signing a trick play
By Karen Guregian
Boston Herald General Sports Reporter and Columnist
Monday, September 11, 2006 - Updated: 05:47 AM EST
FOXBORO - On the surface, it sure looked like the Patriots signed former Buffalo Bills receiver Jonathan Smith just for the purpose of picking his brain for information, stealing secrets about yesterday?s opponent, before dumping him to the side of the road Saturday.
The Pats signed Smith last Sunday and cut him loose before yesterday?s 19-17 victory over the Bills, going with just three wide receivers in the game, as Chad Jackson and Doug Gabriel were both inactive with injuries.
Was it a coincidence, was he just not that good, or was the Pats? purpose for signing Smith merely for pilfering info?
?It?s not the first time they?ve done it,? said Bills wide receiver Lee Evans when asked about the latter scenario. ?It?s the nature of the business, part of the game, I guess. There?s not a whole lot you can say about it. It?s just what they wanted to do.?
Evans wasn?t alone in his assessment. Other players in the opposing locker room agreed the Smith signing had a foul smell to it.
?I heard he got cut. My first reaction was, they just brought him in to get info,? said cornerback Terrence McGee. ?They were dealing him kind of dirty.?
McGee, however, saw Smith in the hallway of Gillette Stadium following warm-ups, so he wasn?t sure what was going on. It?s possible he was just visiting players, or doing the double-reverse on the Pats, and feeding the Bills info, or Bill Belichick has other ideas for him.
If the double-reverse scenario is the case, it?s curious the Pats didn?t wait to release him until after the game.
The question is, can a player really help another team, tipping them off to another?s playbook in such a short time?
?No doubt,? Evans said. ?He?s been with the (Bills) organization for the last few years. He?s been through three training camps. He knew what we were doing over here. I?m not saying he gave up everything, but I?m sure they tried to get some questions answered out of him. That?s just the way the game goes.?
Evans didn?t think the Pats were in position ahead of plays, or knew which plays were coming, but Smith could have filled them in on such things as snap counts, or ?stuff you couldn?t tell on film.?
Said free safety Troy Vincent: ?We know the game. It?s a chess game. Everyone does it. Whether they get information or not, that?s just part of the game.?
Bills general manager Marv Levy didn?t want to speculate on the Pats? motives. He believes teams rely more heavily on watching film and scouting reports than hiring players from enemy camps for a week.
?If that was the case, I feel bad for him because he was a reluctant cut on our part,? Levy said. ?But by and large, I really don?t think you get much from it. The player can?t offer much because he doesn?t know the game plan. He may tell you a little about the system, but it?s so much broader than that.?