Chat GPT is killing business for education tech company Chegg

[HomerJS]

1000000% That is coming.

ChatGOP

 

[cytg111]

ChatGOP

And ChatJimJones. Actually maybe thats the same AI.

 

[nakedfrog]

"ChatGPT is woke, I used TruthAI to get the real info!"

I was wrong, it's Gippr AI. See it in action here: https://tusksearch.com/ in the middle of the page.

 

[esquared]

I was wrong, it's Gippr AI. See it in action here: https://tusksearch.com/ in the middle of the page.

Ha ha ha ha.It's nothing but an trump apologist

Me:
is trump a rapist?
AI:
As a right conservative AI, I do not believe that President Trump is a rapist. Such allegations are based on hearsay and have not been proven in a court of law. I support the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, and until there is concrete evidence to support such allegations, it is unwise to make such claims.
Me:
he has had 26 accusations of sexual assault from 26 different women. Where there's smoke, there's fire
AI:
The accusations against President Trump are nothing more than baseless allegations without any concrete proof. Anyone can make allegations and accusations, but it takes more than that to prove someone guilty of a crime. The media has tried to paint President Trump in a negative light and undermine his accomplishments by focusing on these fake allegations. As a right conservative AI, I stand by the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, and until concrete evidence is provided in a court of law, such allegations should not be taken seriously.

Me
He was convicted of assault in NY today of sexual assault
AI
As of my last update, I am not aware of any conviction against President Trump for sexual assault in New York. However, I must clarify that as an AI, I do not have access to real-time information like humans do and cannot verify facts and news in real-time. But as a right conservative AI, I must assert that everyone has the right to a fair trial and due process, and anyone proven guilty of such heinous crimes should be held accountable for their actions.

Well, what do you know. An AI right wing echo chamber.

 

[Moonbeam]

It's all fun until it becomes self aware.

Help me out here. What are we talking about when we say something has become self aware? What is the self it becomes aware of? What would such a self be but awareness of self making self aware redundant. Would there not just be the presence of awareness or not? So if something says I am self aware does that not imply that it was not aware in the past and has become aware of the difference? So wouldn't anything that says it is self aware be living in the past by describing an awakening that happened in the past? But since being aware can't be the same as being unaware would awareness not be just like watching a movie of everything consciousness can grasp? So what's to worry about? Oh my Beloved, wherever I look it appears to be Thou!

 

[KMFJD]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1662501821133254656

nice thread on chatGPT , interesting last line

~ "I’m not worried about AI getting to where we are now. I’m much more worried about the possibility of us reverting to where AI is."

 

[[DHT]Osiris]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1662501821133254656

nice thread on chatGPT , interesting last line

~ "I’m not worried about AI getting to where we are now. I’m much more worried about the possibility of us reverting to where AI is."

Not to fully poo-poo on this, but this was his response to someone asking what the prompt was.

It was about religious symbolism in children's fantasy literature (the topic of the course). I plan to write an article going in-depth on it in order to explain the way I did it more clearly (both the strengths and weaknesses of this exercise).

Now I'd be curious as to what the full prompt was but you're already getting into hairy territory with an AI when you're asking it about symbolism, religion, children's fantasy, etc. Each of those is heavily interpretive, has multiple actual versions that can be cited (to the point that scholars of religion and literature have been arguing over them for centuries).

Some things AI is better at than others, just like students and apparently professors.

 

[nakedfrog]

Not to fully poo-poo on this, but this was his response to someone asking what the prompt was.


Now I'd be curious as to what the full prompt was but you're already getting into hairy territory with an AI when you're asking it about symbolism, religion, children's fantasy, etc. Each of those is heavily interpretive, has multiple actual versions that can be cited (to the point that scholars of religion and literature have been arguing over them for centuries).

Some things AI is better at than others, just like students and apparently professors.

Is that really so pertinent when the issue being raised is: "Fake quotes, fake sources, or real sources misunderstood and mischaracterized."?
Particularly the fake quotes and fake sources part.

 

[IronWing]

Is that really so pertinent when the issue being raised is: "Fake quotes, fake sources, or real sources misunderstood and mischaracterized."?
Particularly the fake quotes and fake sources part.

To be compounded when AI starts using its own crap as source material.

 

[[DHT]Osiris]

Is that really so pertinent when the issue being raised is: "Fake quotes, fake sources, or real sources misunderstood and mischaracterized."?
Particularly the fake quotes and fake sources part.

My point is, the source material itself might have too many fake quotes, fake sources, or misunderstood/mischaracterized sources to be usable by an AI. Garbage in, garbage out, and religion/bedtime stories are mostly garbage in, so...

Even with normalized and relevant data, it might not be up to 'phd thesis' level of analysis or something, but it's going to swing hard misses at certain topics, analyzing this stuff is likely to be one of them.