Charlie Rangel (D - NY) thinks "white cra*ker" is a "term of endearment"

[xBiffx]

I didn't, it was HTFOff that made the claims that 1) Perry is NOT a criminal and 2) Rangel is a criminal; http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36895622&postcount=26

Actually, you can thank thraashman for bringing it up.

That still doesn't excuse you from doubling down on the stupid.

 

[Newell Steamer]

Actually, you can thank Thraashman for bringing it up.

Thraashman did not use the word fact.

HTFOff did.

Since HTFOff has nothing more than silence and possibly insults, would you like to prove to me that Rangel is a criminal? Show me, his;
- arrest
- conviction
- time served

 

[HTFOff]

Thraashman did not use the word fact.

HTFOff did.

Since HTFOff has nothing more than silence and possibly insults, would you like to prove to me that Rangel is a criminal? Show me, his;
- arrest
- conviction
- time served

I like to think my response(s) we plenty remedial, thank you very much.

Just to wrap things up i'll throw this in

Mr. Rangel soon admitted having failed to report rental income of $75,000 over the years. First he blamed his wife for the oversight because he said she was supposed to be managing the property. Then he blamed the language barrier. “Every time I thought I was getting somewhere, they’d start speaking Spanish,” Mr. Rangel explained.

Mr. Rangel promised last fall to amend his tax returns, pay what is due and correct the information on his annual financial disclosure form. But the deadline for the 2008 filing was May 15 and as of last week he still had not filed. His press spokesman declined to answer questions about anything related to his ethics problems. http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203946904574300013592601036

Like I said, it's not like anybody is denying Rangel is a fraud, except you. If that's your journey hey, rock on with your bad self.

 

[Newell Steamer]

I like to think my response(s) we plenty remedial, thank you very much.

Just to wrap things up i'll throw this in

Like I said, it's not like anybody is denying Rangel is a fraud, except you. If that's your journey hey, rock on with your bad self.

You still don't have anything to back your 'factual' claim.

No proof of an arrest, conviction or time served - things are indeed wrapped up; Rangel is not, in fact, a criminal.

 

[HTFOff]

You still don't have anything to back your 'factual' claim.

No proof of an arrest, conviction or time served - things are indeed wrapped up; Rangel is not, in fact, a criminal.

Well, now that you put it like that.

Rangel - REDEMPTION!

Keep it up. :thumbsup:

 

[PokerGuy]

You still don't have anything to back your 'factual' claim.

No proof of an arrest, conviction or time served - things are indeed wrapped up; Rangel is not, in fact, a criminal.

So your position is apparently that the only criminals that exist in the world are those that have been arrested, convicted and served time. I'd hope you can see the obvious problem with that position , but the point is valid, he is not technically a criminal in the eyes of the law.

 

[xBiffx]

Thraashman did not use the word fact.

HTFOff did.

Since HTFOff has nothing more than silence and possibly insults, would you like to prove to me that Rangel is a criminal? Show me, his;
- arrest
- conviction
- time served

You are being moronically pedantic. Good show.

 

[Newell Steamer]

You are being moronically pedantic. Good show.

Ah, because I want someone to back their claims of FACTS,.. wait,.. I just realized who I am speaking to,...

:awe:

 

[HTFOff]

So your position is apparently that the only criminals that exist in the world are those that have been arrested, convicted and served time. I'd hope you can see the obvious problem with that position , but the point is valid, he is not technically a criminal in the eyes of the law.

Rangel cut a deal to avoid trial and like most people in a position of power, only got a slap on the wrist.

 

[xBiffx]

Ah, because I want someone to back their claims of FACTS,.. wait,.. I just realized who I am speaking to,...

:awe:

No, because your definition of criminal is not only myopic and silly, its completely self serving.

You are moronically pedantic to the core on this.

 

[Newell Steamer]

So your position is apparently that the only criminals that exist in the world are those that have been arrested, convicted and served time. I'd hope you can see the obvious problem with that position , but the point is valid, he is not technically a criminal in the eyes of the law.

Ah, this about what you think is or isn't criminal - but, let me guess, exclusively just to you and whoever thinks like you, right?

Sorry, the world doesn't revolved around your ideals; there are governments and laws in place.

Sure, they are not ideal, but, it's far better than having to rely on people like you who already have a predetermined opinion "fact" on someone who is up on trail for a crime, a crime that is a crime,.. just because you said so.

This is civilization son, leave your hill people and backwood folk antics in the wild.

 

[HTFOff]

Ah, because I want someone to back their claims of FACTS,.. wait,.. I just realized who I am speaking to,...

:awe:

Rangel admitted to hiding income off that snazzy caribbean abode. Regardless of him not knowing he profited off it (LOL) or lying on purpose, it's illegal.

I thought liberals are all for paying your fair share? Here you are going to bat for this sleazeball.

Cutting off your nose to spite your face - not a good look, Mr. Steamer

 

[Newell Steamer]

No, because your definition of criminal is not only myopic and silly, its completely self serving.

You are moronically pedantic to the core on this.

Actually, it's the other way around; laws (which is what I am going by here) serve the people,.. not the opinions and thoughts of three blow hards, over one person, on the internet.

You've been battling for your own self serving needs; you demand something be recognized a crime, because of YOUR beliefs, not what has been ruled as so (or not in this case) by the government.

It must suck to not have things go your way, on a matter that doesn't even affect you frankly,... but, you'll show us, no one is going to push xBiffx around,... harumff!!

:biggrin:

 

[Newell Steamer]

Rangel admitted to hiding income off that snazzy caribbean abode. Regardless of him not knowing he profited off it (LOL) or lying on purpose, it's illegal.

I thought liberals are all for paying your fair share? Here you are going to bat for this sleazeball.

Cutting off your nose to spite your face - not a good look, Mr. Steamer

Oh, so your are not done??

Just to wrap things up,...

 

[xBiffx]

Actually, it's the other way around; laws (which is what I am going by here) serve the people,.. not the opinions and thoughts of three blow hards, over one person, on the internet.

You've been battling for your own self serving needs; you demand something be recognized a crime, because of YOUR beliefs, not what has been ruled as so (or not in this case) by the government.

It must suck to not have things go your way, on a matter that doesn't even affect you frankly,... but, you'll show us, no one is going to push xBiffx around,... harumff!!

:biggrin:

Doing a quick search on your name and the word "criminal" comes up with many uses of the word. You mean to tell me the word meant the same thing everytime you used it? That it only referred to those who had been arrested, convicted, and served time? I think you should do a quick check before answering that, just sayin. :whiste:

 

[Newell Steamer]

Doing a quick search on your name and the word "criminal" comes up with many uses of the word. You mean to tell me the word meant the same thing everytime you used it? That it only referred to those who had been arrested, convicted, and served time? I think you should do a quick check before answering that, just sayin. :whiste:

,.. did I also use the word FACT in each these times?

Listen hayseed, you go off and run your own analysis on when I said what and how it was said - knock yourself out.

 

[xBiffx]

,.. did I also use the word FACT before each of these times?

Listen hayseed, you go off and run your own analysis on when I said what and how it was said - knock yourself out.

No, you aren't pedantic. Not at all. :whiste:

 

[HTFOff]

Oh, so your are not done??

Your defiance has died down some. Good.

Now go ahead and call it a day, little bud. In a few days everyone will forget all about your little episode today.

 

[Newell Steamer]

Your defiance has died down some. Good.

Now go ahead and call it a day, little bud. In a few days everyone will forget all about your little episode today.

Owning you wasn't 'little'.

It took quite a few posts for you to get to the point where you produced NOTHING on a statement you claimed was a fact.

 

[Newell Steamer]

No, you aren't pedantic. Not at all. :whiste:

Not my fault you wrote a check you can't back; show the correlation or move along.

 

[xBiffx]

Owning you wasn't 'little'.

It took quite a few posts for you to get to the point where you produced NOTHING on a statement you claimed was a fact.

Oh is that a FACT?

From where I'm sitting, you're the one who just got in FACT owned. Good luck in your future endeavors.

Not my fault you wrote a check you can't back; show the correlation or move along.

LOL.

 

[HTFOff]

I think I struck a chord. :awe:

Any more "ownings" you want to dish out, shakespeare?

 

[xBiffx]

I think I struck a chord. :awe:

Any more "ownings" you want to dish out, shakespeare?

That's why all I can do is laugh at this point.

 

[Newell Steamer]

That's why all I can do is laugh at this point.

 

[Londo_Jowo]

I have to wonder if a certain someone who lives in NYC happened to vote for Rangel, possibly multiple times.