- Sep 30, 2003
- 26,907
- 173
- 106
Everyone seems pursuaded that the Dems will lose FL & MI in the general election if their Dem voters are "disenfanchised" in the primary process. (Of course many of us are left wondering how this wasn't a concern for about half a year. A recent sudden epiphany corrected that I suppose).
But I think this assumption should be questioned. My primary vote has never counted. I've never lived in an early voting state. This has never kept me from voting in the general election.
Would I pout like a little kid and refuse to vote in the general election were I a FL or MI democrat? H3ll no!
Would it turn me into, gasp, a Republican? Again, h3ll no!
I still think it funny that many say that "the votes must count!", "You cannot disenfranchise the voters of FL & MI", and then turn around and support a system where the DNC created SD's can overturn the voters thus making the vote count meaningless and disenfranchising voters anyway.
Fern
But I think this assumption should be questioned. My primary vote has never counted. I've never lived in an early voting state. This has never kept me from voting in the general election.
Would I pout like a little kid and refuse to vote in the general election were I a FL or MI democrat? H3ll no!
Would it turn me into, gasp, a Republican? Again, h3ll no!
I still think it funny that many say that "the votes must count!", "You cannot disenfranchise the voters of FL & MI", and then turn around and support a system where the DNC created SD's can overturn the voters thus making the vote count meaningless and disenfranchising voters anyway.
Fern