• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

ceramique or as5

Difference in performance or what??? AS has the edge in performance but very slightly. Cermique is still excellent and if I had to guess I would say there probably isn't more than 1-2C difference at most with either one when applied properly, and Ceramique is about as goof proof as they come. Using Ceramique on an XP-90 with my 3800 Newcastle my temps are usually in the 30C's under load so I don't bother with AS now.
 
To answer your question, very little differance between the two, Ceramique is easyer to
apply properly. AS5*might* give 1C better delta after 200 hours of use.

The paste provided by ThermalRight and Zalman are very good. They are even with the
CoolerMaster Premium tested here. I have seen the links for several sites testing that shows
this to be true. Last months Maximum PC had a short article covering testing of different TIM.

http://www.madshrimps.be/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=20474

The Coollaboritories Liquid Metal is not avalible State side yet and iirc is not friendly when
in contact with aluminum.


...Galvanized
 
I use ceramique. It's probably a little easier to appy, but not really a big difference either way. If I was to buy some again, I'd just get which ever one was cheaper at the time.
 
Artic Silver 5. Personally it sounds much "cooler" to me than ceramic stuff does. Both seem to work the same, but I mean, think about which one sounds cooler to you.
 
I use ceramique here as it is easier to clean and completly non conductive or capacitive unlike AS 5 (though AS 5 is only capactive slightly).

-spike
 
Depends...AS5 will give you slightly better resistance, but I think both are easy to clean. I've cleaned AS5 off a CPU easily.

AS5 for CPU.

Ceramique for GPU cuz you don't want spark spark pop pop zap zap + black smoke....
 
Originally posted by: GalvanizedYankee
To answer your question, very little difference between the two, Ceramique is easier to
apply properly. AS5*might* give 1C better delta after 200 hours of use.

The paste provided by ThermalRight and Zalman are very good.
...Galvanized

Absolutely. I ran out of Ceramique and used the Zalman compound on my Zalman 7000 C\Au (or whatever it's called) and my temps are in the dirt. I'm only using it on a 3100 Sempron64 which doesn't need any serious cooling, but my temps average 24C idle and may hit 30C while encoding video. It's good enough that I don't have any plans to change it.

I have another very similar rig with a 3400 Sempron and Ceramique with the same Zalman and the temps are too close to tell which is which.
 
Back
Top