Census on bad clusters

Total

Junior Member
Mar 8, 2001
13
0
0
OK... we all are familuar with BAD clusters appearing on HDD's. Recently I had 3 out of 4 new IBM Deskstars start having bad clusters at a very early age. I wrote IBM an email asking their advice. They replyed staiting that bad clusters are commonly caused by faulty software. That be told I just take more effort in scaning my IBM drives now.

A few days ago an old 8GB Seagate HDD started acting very odd. I decided to format the drive and reinstall the OS (it needed this anyway). During the format 48 BAD clusters where detected. After the format I ran scandisk... 42 more where detected.... on the second scandisk pass 2 more.

I have searched meny forums for simular topics and just wanted to ask what everyones opinions are. I realize that most of the information I find on the subject is simply someones opinion (even IBM's).

What causes BAD clusters?
Will a low level format really fix BAD clusters and will they return soon after?
If a drive has rapidly appearing BAD clusters (92 out of 2,058,308 as mention above), still use it ??
 

BrainSalad

Banned
Mar 3, 2001
266
0
0
Dude, that's f*cked! Are you using the original OS cd or a *cough* legal back up copy you made that might have corrup files on it from the burn?
 

Total

Junior Member
Mar 8, 2001
13
0
0
The 4 IBM HDD's are in four different computers (2 Win98 & 2 Win2K) on *cough* OS CD's.

The Seagate was running an early version of Win2K but that ran fine for a longgg time. (seti box)