Originally posted by: Kermy
Wasn't the next Xbox going to use the same CPU as the PS3?
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Skiguy411
So what does this mean to the average consumer? Faster processing speeds?
The inevitable realization of Ultra-Porn!
Originally posted by: Jigga
No, I'm not an EE, I'm a future MBAOriginally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
You're not an EE are you?Originally posted by: Jigga
HOWEVER, with IBM designing workstations around Cell, and Sony/Toshiba putting them in TVs and other devices, I bet we can see some cool things coming out of this. Imagine a TV that can decode ANY video input, upconvert it to 1080p and play it back with Faroudja-like quality? Imagine not needing a special DVD player to play back the latest version of Divx, Xvid, 3ivx, WMV etc. etc. etc. because the TV can do all that? All you need is a dumb disc reader that can feed content to the TV and the TV takes care of the rest.All the things you stated are a lot easier said than done (and some are not handled by the CPU, for that matter).
. I understand you can do all these things with fixed-function chips and DSPs, and I was only giving some examples. The key thing is that you would be able to upgrade the capabilities of your TV without replacing it. Why wouldn't Sony prefer to sell you one TV for $3000 and then collect $50-$100 every year for software upgrades, rather than risking you buying a TV from a competitor six years later? The advantage of having a CPU on a TV is you could theoretically connect a computer to it wirelessly over Ethernet--without any connection between video card and TV. You could also program it according to your cable TV or satellite operator, eliminating the need for a set-top box. The Cell sounds like it can takeover the duties of a bunch of fixed-function chips/DSPs and accomplish all their tasks faster and in parallel.
Originally posted by: Jigga
One key thing to note is that aside from memory width, the FPUs are essentially 128bit processors!
Link?Originally posted by: Jigga
Other articles have said that the prototype and the version powering PS3 are NOT the same chip! The PS3 Cell will NOT run at 4GHz and will likely have 6 SPEs vs. 8. While 4GHz is theoretically possible, analysts expect PS3's Cell to run between 2-3GHz.
Well, it does, but the entire chip is about the same size as the 0.18 um P4 2.0 GHz Williamette.Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
That sounds really expensive.
Overhyped? Yes. Good performer? Yes, also.Originally posted by: SportSC4
hey looks great.
sony is great at hyping anything.
i'll be impressed when i see what a developer says about their chipset and video of in game footage.
remember the "emotion engine" hype for the ps2?
or ooo... the "64-bit" Jaguar?
all were soo overhyped and i can't believe people are falling for it all over again (at least wait for something tangible)
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
That sounds really expensive.
Yes, it sounds like a single-core PowerPC with VMX and SMT, plus 8 additional SPE cores.Originally posted by: TuxDave
I'm slightly confused. Wasn't this supposed to be the dual core processor? I count only one? Two threads on one processor sounds like hyperthreading... what am I missing?

 
				
		