• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Cell phones can affect sperm quality

  • Thread starter Thread starter 0
  • Start date Start date

0

Golden Member
"We believe that these devices are used because we consider them very safe, but it could cause harmful effects due to the proximity of the phones and the exposure that they are causing to the gonads," says lead researcher Ashok Agarwal, the Director of the Center for Reproductive Medicine.

In the small study, Agarwal's team took semen samples from 32 men and brought them to the lab. Each man's sample was placed into small, conical tubes and divided into two parts: a test group and a control group. The control group was unexposed to cell phone emissions, but kept under the same conditions and temperature as the test group.

The semen in the test group was placed 2.5 centimeters from an 850 MHz cell phone in talk mode for 1 hour. Researchers say that 850 MHz is the most commonly used frequency.

They used the measurement of 2.5 centimeters to mimic the distance between the trouser pocket and the testes. Agarwal reasoned that many men keep their active cell phones in their pants pocket while talking on their headsets.


Overall, researchers found an increase in oxidative stress such as a significant increase in free radicals and oxidants and a decrease in antioxidants. Agarwal says that equals a decrease in sperm's quality, including motility and viability. Evidence of oxidative stress can appear under other conditions, including exposure to certain environmental pollutants or infections in the urinary genital tract.

"On average, there was an 85 percent increase in the amount of free radicals for all the subjects in the study. Free radicals have been linked to a variety of diseases in humans including cancer," said Agarwal. Free radicals have been linked to decreased sperm quality in previous studies.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH...phone.sperm/index.html
 
Originally posted by: Shawn
That's nice and all, but I don't put my cell phone up to my nuts to talk.

Yes, but you probably set your laptop on your lap.
 
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: Shawn
That's nice and all, but I don't put my cell phone up to my nuts to talk.

Yes, but you probably set your laptop on your lap.

What does that have to do with cell phones?

WiFi?

2.4GHz, not 850MHz.

And isn't 900MHz GSM? Who uses GSM cell phones these days? lol
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: Shawn
That's nice and all, but I don't put my cell phone up to my nuts to talk.

Yes, but you probably set your laptop on your lap.

What does that have to do with cell phones?

WiFi?

2.4GHz, not 850MHz.

And isn't 900MHz GSM? Who uses GSM cell phones these days? lol

You proved my point well Eli. Higher frequencies mean higher energy.... Although laptop emissions are at a lower power, they do disperse a higher frequency which isn't exactly a good thing.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: Shawn
That's nice and all, but I don't put my cell phone up to my nuts to talk.

Yes, but you probably set your laptop on your lap.

What does that have to do with cell phones?

WiFi?

2.4GHz, not 850MHz.

And isn't 900MHz GSM? Who uses GSM cell phones these days? lol

Not me. CDMA FTW.
 
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: Shawn
That's nice and all, but I don't put my cell phone up to my nuts to talk.

Yes, but you probably set your laptop on your lap.

What does that have to do with cell phones?

WiFi?

2.4GHz, not 850MHz.

And isn't 900MHz GSM? Who uses GSM cell phones these days? lol

You proved my point well Eli. Higher frequencies mean higher energy.... Although laptop emissions are at a lower power, they do disperse a higher frequency which isn't exactly a good thing.
What?

Higher frequency absolutely does not mean higher energy. It means the RF is modulated at a higher frequency, nothing more.

Energy input determines energy output, not frequency.

500mA at 1MHz is the same as 500mA at 1THz. Both output 500mA of RF energy.

Not to say that the frequency doesn't matter, but it's not "higher energy".
 
Originally posted by: Shawn
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: Shawn
That's nice and all, but I don't put my cell phone up to my nuts to talk.

Yes, but you probably set your laptop on your lap.

What does that have to do with cell phones?

WiFi?

2.4GHz, not 850MHz.

And isn't 900MHz GSM? Who uses GSM cell phones these days? lol

Not me. CDMA FTW.

I use both.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: Shawn
That's nice and all, but I don't put my cell phone up to my nuts to talk.

Yes, but you probably set your laptop on your lap.

What does that have to do with cell phones?

WiFi?

2.4GHz, not 850MHz.

And isn't 900MHz GSM? Who uses GSM cell phones these days? lol

850 MHz and 1900 MHz are both used for GSM in the states. T-Mo is 1900 only. Uh, and considering AT&T/T-Mo make up a huge share of US cellular subscribers, I'd say a whole fuck ton. CDMA phones run on 850/1900 too, nothing is stopping it from being 850 only or 1900 only.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: Shawn
That's nice and all, but I don't put my cell phone up to my nuts to talk.

Yes, but you probably set your laptop on your lap.

What does that have to do with cell phones?

WiFi?

2.4GHz, not 850MHz.

And isn't 900MHz GSM? Who uses GSM cell phones these days? lol

You proved my point well Eli. Higher frequencies mean higher energy.... Although laptop emissions are at a lower power, they do disperse a higher frequency which isn't exactly a good thing.
What?

Higher frequency absolutely does not mean higher energy. It means the RF is modulated at a higher frequency, nothing more.

Energy input determines energy output, not frequency.

500mA at 1MHz is the same as 500mA at 1THz. Both output 500mA of RF energy.

Not to say that the frequency doesn't matter, but it's not "higher energy".

I'm sure this has been covered somewhere before, but (and I mean this with the utmost sincerity) how the hell do you know so much?? In your thread about college you make it clear that you have no education past HS, but damn man, you have some impressive knowledge.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: Shawn
That's nice and all, but I don't put my cell phone up to my nuts to talk.

Yes, but you probably set your laptop on your lap.

What does that have to do with cell phones?

WiFi?

2.4GHz, not 850MHz.

And isn't 900MHz GSM? Who uses GSM cell phones these days? lol

GSM is 1900 too
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: 0
Originally posted by: Shawn
That's nice and all, but I don't put my cell phone up to my nuts to talk.

Yes, but you probably set your laptop on your lap.

What does that have to do with cell phones?

WiFi?

2.4GHz, not 850MHz.

And isn't 900MHz GSM? Who uses GSM cell phones these days? lol

You proved my point well Eli. Higher frequencies mean higher energy.... Although laptop emissions are at a lower power, they do disperse a higher frequency which isn't exactly a good thing.
What?

Higher frequency absolutely does not mean higher energy. It means the RF is modulated at a higher frequency, nothing more.

Energy input determines energy output, not frequency.

500mA at 1MHz is the same as 500mA at 1THz. Both output 500mA of RF energy.

Not to say that the frequency doesn't matter, but it's not "higher energy".
Current != energy
 
Originally posted by: Howard
Current != energy
Heh.

Power? 😛 Would that be more correct? I do get my terminology mixed up. 😉 I guess I should have used watts, not amps.. correct?

Originally posted by: arrfep


I'm sure this has been covered somewhere before, but (and I mean this with the utmost sincerity) how the hell do you know so much?? In your thread about college you make it clear that you have no education past HS, but damn man, you have some impressive knowledge.
lol..

Nah. In all honesty, I feel pretty dumb. I understand the basics of how a lot of things work. You would be surprised how far that can get you. Everybody has their specialties though.

I know electronics basics, but my knowledge pales in comparison to any of the EEs here. However, I do know the internal combustion engine like the back of my hand, so I'm sure my knowledge in that area would trump that of the EEs.

Probably not the MechE with a focus on thermodynamics, though. You get what I'm saying. I'm sure you have a hobby or something that you're interested in that I know little or nothing about.

It's just that I retain a lot of information I read. I have always been self-taught, I'm a learner.. It's what feeds me, what I strive for. I'm not happy unless I'm learning, tinkering, building.. doing something that uses my brain.

That's why it's funny that the idea of [*.engineering] school is so intimidating to me. But it's also really exciting, because I can only imagine what I can do with the knowledge I will gain. I really can't wait. 🙂
 
Back
Top