• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Celeron Tualatin is pretty fast at OGR.

Eug

Eug

Lifer
Celeron 1.4 GHz Tualatin benches:

[Feb 09 15:58:32 UTC] OGR: rate: 10,068,655 nodes/sec <-- not sure if this is accurate. It changed from 9 something to 10 something when I ran the bench.

[Feb 09 15:58:32 UTC] OGR: using core #0 (GARSP 5.13-A).
[Feb 09 15:58:52 UTC] OGR: Benchmark for core #0 (GARSP 5.13-A)
0.00:00:17.27 [9,794,215 nodes/sec]
[Feb 09 15:58:52 UTC] OGR: using core #1 (GARSP 5.13-B).
[Feb 09 15:59:12 UTC] OGR: Benchmark for core #1 (GARSP 5.13-B)
0.00:00:17.14 [9,724,529 nodes/sec] <-- I hit 9.8 something on one bench

[Feb 09 15:54:01 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (ANSI 4-pipe).
[Feb 09 15:54:21 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (ANSI 4-pipe)
0.00:00:17.04 [901,048 keys/sec]
[Feb 09 15:54:21 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (ANSI 2-pipe).
[Feb 09 15:54:40 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (ANSI 2-pipe)
0.00:00:17.04 [1,252,120 keys/sec]
[Feb 09 15:54:40 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (ANSI 1-pipe).
[Feb 09 15:55:00 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (ANSI 1-pipe)
0.00:00:17.37 [833,560 keys/sec]
[Feb 09 15:55:00 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (SES 1-pipe).
[Feb 09 15:55:19 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (SES 1-pipe)
0.00:00:16.72 [2,586,777 keys/sec]
[Feb 09 15:55:19 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (SES 2-pipe).
[Feb 09 15:55:39 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (SES 2-pipe)
0.00:00:17.02 [2,950,446 keys/sec]
[Feb 09 15:55:39 UTC] RC5-72: using core #5 (DG 2-pipe).
[Feb 09 15:55:58 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #5 (DG 2-pipe)
0.00:00:16.28 [2,453,923 keys/sec]
[Feb 09 15:55:58 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (DG 3-pipe).
[Feb 09 15:56:17 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (DG 3-pipe)
0.00:00:16.72 [2,599,759 keys/sec]
[Feb 09 15:56:17 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (DG 3-pipe alt).
[Feb 09 15:56:37 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (DG 3-pipe alt)
0.00:00:16.98 [2,549,754 keys/sec]
 
OK. Benched core #1 at 9810854 nodes/sec. That's nearly as fast as a 2.6 GHz Pentium 4. :Q

The best part? My computer is a 4 year old BX. 😛 This thing is never gonna die...

Now to go check RC-72 on my G4 laptop...
 
Holy moly, those are some good numbers indeed!:Q I wonder if Banis is as closely related to the P3 as they say it is? If so, those laptops may come in handy.😉

PS Don't expect magic out of the G4s; there isn't an optimized RC5-72 core for the G4's
 
Nice! 🙂

They don't do to badly at SETI either ,though they really need to be o/ced on a high FSB to really shine

Did you use the Slocket T?
 
Originally posted by: Assimilator1
Did you use the Slocket T?
Click to expand...
Yep. Asus P2B BX mobo I bought in 1999, with Upgradeware Slot-T and Celeron 1.4@1.4.

Chugs along just fine with ALL my case fans removed, using just my Enermax Whisper. (92 mm fan of Whisper normal voltage, but 80 mm fan undervolted to 7V.)

Long live BX!

 
I have been using a Celeron 667MHz (Coppermine) @ 950MHz for almost two years...


until today.


I got a Celeron 1.3GHz and the Tualatin socket adapter from Compgeeks for my non-Tualatin board. I burned it in for about 3 hours and bumped it up to 1.53GHz (13x118MHz) with my PC133 SDRAM @ 157MHz CAS3. It's really fast!! SETI seems to process work units about 2X faster than before.
 
fr and Eug,

I have a number of Slot-1 boards with Celly2's and slotkets. They are mostly abit boards. Do either of you have links to an adapter that would work with this setup and the Celeron-T? I looked on Compgeeks and found a socket-370 style adapter. I guess that would work in conjunction with the slotket.

Thanks!
 
Thanks guys! I am amazed that only one company in the US carries Upgradeware's Slot-T adapter! :Q

Mark, What SETI times do you get on it and how high did you OC the chip?
 
Well I've yet to have a WU done by the Soyo ,my son has that mbrd now & he rarely runs SETI🙁 ,I'll let you know when I have a time from that.
Its got a Cel 1.1A@1.38 ,it wouldn't go higher though that could be down to the PC100 CL2/PC133 CL3 RAM holding things back ,its still at CAS2🙂

I have another Celeron Tualatin rig which has done many WUs though🙂 ,its on a VIA chipset , a 1.1A@1.46GHz ,it does average AR WUs in about 5hrs25mins🙂.A BX chipset at the same FSB & RAM settings would do a little better
 
Thanks Mark! I might try this on a system, but it may only increase production by 1 to 1.5 WUs per day for $70 to $80. So, I'm not sure it is worth it.
 
Sell the existing one...hmmmm....you've got a good point Mark. I honestestly hadn't considered that. But, I don't suppose a Celly2-600 that will run at 900MHz is worth much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top