• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Celeron D better than old Celeron

roguerower

Diamond Member
I heard that the Celeron D in laptops are much better and much more powerful than the older celerons. True or false. Trying to save my mom some money on a budget laptop.
 
Originally posted by: beverage
also, the celeron D is mostly in desktops, with the celeron M appearing in current laptops

no, there are lappies with the D models.

OP - I believe AT did a review of the new cellerons, might be worth a look there as well.

IMHO, Celeron M > Celeron D > Old Celerons
 
Originally posted by: Jassi
IMHO, Celeron M > Celeron D > Old Celerons

Agreed. The Celeron M is based on the Pentium M core, while the Celeron D is a Prescott-based chip, and the old Celerons were either Northwood or Willamette-based.

Below is a breakdown of the chips:

--Celeron M--
Pentium M (Dothan) based core
400MHz FSB
512KB L2 Cache

--Celeron D--
Pentium 4 (Prescott) based core
533MHz FSB
256KB L2 Cache

--Celeron--
Pentium 4 (Northwood\Willamette) based core
400MHz FSB
128KB L2 Cache
 
Originally posted by: geforcetony
Originally posted by: Jassi
IMHO, Celeron M > Celeron D > Old Celerons

Agreed. The Celeron M is based on the Pentium M core, while the Celeron D is a Prescott-based chip, and the old Celerons were either Northwood or Willamette-based.

Below is a breakdown of the chips:

--Celeron M--
Pentium M (Dothan) based core
400MHz FSB
512KB L2 Cache

--Celeron D--
Pentium 4 (Prescott) based core
533MHz FSB
256KB L2 Cache

--Celeron--
Pentium 4 (Northwood\Willamette) based core
400MHz FSB
128KB L2 Cache

:thumbsup:
 
yes.

Normally, Northwood based cores are better clock for clock than Prescotts, but the 256 MB cache of the D makes a HUGE difference when compared to the old celeron. The bus speed difference also help
 
Thanks for the replies. My mom got a 1.3 Ghz Celeron M with 512mb ram so it should run pretty well. Thanks for the replies.
 
Originally posted by: roguerower
Thanks for the replies. My mom got a 1.3 Ghz Celeron M with 512mb ram so it should run pretty well. Thanks for the replies.

Trust me, she will not notice much of a difference and it will be a lot cooler.
 
Prescott has lower performance compared to Northwood, but in Celerons case, with 533MHz FSB, and the low impact of L2 cache size on performance, Celeron D's are like 15-20% faster than Celerons.
 
The problem with Celeron D's IMO, is that because the CPU's pipeline is so huge (31 stages) when compared to the original Celeron's (20 stages), it is downright pathetic at lower speeds (i.e. 2.4GHz). The Prescott core's design shows that it needs high clock speeds to keep the massive pipeline well fed. So, in this case, the "Old" Celeron or the Celeron M are the best chips. BTW, the Celeron M is based on the Pentium M (as I said above), which itself is essentially a steroiodal version of the P-III.
 
Originally posted by: IntelUser2000
geforcetony, you are absolutely wrong. Look at this: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2093

Celeron D is significantly faster than old Celeron, and anyone with a brain can see that.

2GHz Celeron D with 400MHz outperforms 2.6GHz Celeron.

Well, mister "IntelUser". Maybe the "Presshot" Celerons perform a slight bit better than their Northwood counterparts, but "anyone with a brain", save good ol' Intel fanbois, would choose a Northwood over a Presshot anyday. They run cooler, BTW.
 
Back
Top