- Sep 14, 2003
- 8,115
- 0
- 76
I remember reading when the CCC first came out that it was sort of a memory hog and not really worth it. Is this still true? I have Cats 5.6 and want to install 5.10 but am not sure whether to get the CCC or not.
Originally posted by: BFG10K
CCC is just as bloated and slow as when it came out. Use ATi Tray Tools instead.
Is that third party? I just installed 5.10 with the CCC, seems fine, I disabled the tray icon and anything in startup related to it.Originally posted by: BFG10K
CCC is just as bloated and slow as when it came out. Use ATi Tray Tools instead.
Yes, and it's only 900KB (as opposed to ~8 MB for CCC) and only uses 3.5 MB memory when it's running.Is that third party?
Originally posted by: BW86
Originally posted by: BFG10K
CCC is just as bloated and slow as when it came out. Use ATi Tray Tools instead.
:thumbsup:
I think I would follow that advice IF I actually used those settings often and changed them and accessed them a lot. I never touch them, really, just leave AA maxed for everything, etc., so I can just use the CCC and disable any background/tray stuff.Originally posted by: M0RPH
I would recommend installing the drivers only and then installing ATI Tray Tools. It uses very little resources and it does everything that CCC does plus lots more.