First, check the unit of measure (100MHz versus 100 Mbps, perhaps?).
Next, check the release date of the book, original date of publishing, revisions, updates, etc.
Finally, there *is* a context to that statement. For example, if you were to use a broadband balun (commonly available for structured cabling), you could feed cable TV on that UTP / Cat{anything} over the rated 100 meter span successfully. That would be significant, since the upper UHF channels are above 900MHz.
Other factors are power levels, type of signaling / encoding, and the receiver's sensitivity and selectivity.
General statements in print that assign absolutes are usually done to keep things simple. It is extremely rare to be without exception and nuance.
Within the scope of the thing where you read that, it's "true enough" or maybe "the current version of the truth." If you talk to an RCDD certified person, they can explain and demonstrate to you why it's "not necessarily" the truth.
Scope and context are everything for this kind of discussion.
Good Luck
Scott