Sphexi
Diamond Member
Reading another forum I frequent, a poster brought up a situation he was in. Basically he got some work done on his car, which neither fixed it, and turned out costing more than he was originally told by the owner of the repair shop. He was upset and told the guy he wouldn't pay more than was originally quoted to him, the owner told him that they didn't hold to quotes and he had to pay. It basically escalated to the point where the repair shop owner said he would simply come get the guy's car until he paid, possibly charging him for a tow and "storage" on top of anything.
Now, I haven't been to school in a few years, and the only real law I ever studied was business law, but unless the repair shop owner is the lien holder, does he really have a right, legally or otherwise, to simply take possession of a car? I understand that money is owed for services, and obviously it could be taken to court and dealt with that way, but I wouldn't think someone can simply take a vehicle, unless money is owed on the actual ownership of the vehicle itself.
Now, I haven't been to school in a few years, and the only real law I ever studied was business law, but unless the repair shop owner is the lien holder, does he really have a right, legally or otherwise, to simply take possession of a car? I understand that money is owed for services, and obviously it could be taken to court and dealt with that way, but I wouldn't think someone can simply take a vehicle, unless money is owed on the actual ownership of the vehicle itself.