- Jun 30, 2004
- 16,369
- 1,904
- 126
Perhaps I could've asked the question in the Title line.
As per another thread about car-audio "upgrades", I have an older pre-2000 OEM audio system -- 4-channel, 12-CD changer that I want to continue using. It has a cassette player!!! -- which offers to be a solution for upgrading the system to two-channel-stereo Bluetooth. Sound quality is great.
And -- I have my own purposes: Not only do I want to retain the old system with some peripheral upgrades, I want to use the FM-receiver so that it only functions with short-range reception. That is, I want to attenuate the reception where most people would want to make it more powerful.
The first thing I can think of doing is to simply remove the antenna connection to the car's external antenna. I see the possibility of then adding an auxiliary tuner which will replace the OEM's function for listening to FM radio. I can connect the antenna-coax to this auxiliary tuner.
Somehow, I'm under the impression that FM receivers disconnected from their spec antennae still function to receive very short-range transmissions. Is this true? If it isn't, I'd need to explore some simple method of attenuating the reception of the connected antenna.
ADDENDUM and UPDATE: I'm still interested in the answer to my question here -- What sort of short-range reception does an FM-receiver get with an unconnected antenna? But the reason I'm asking the question no longer has a compelling motive. Use of empty FM channels to get sound from an add-on Bluetooth-enabled FM-transmitter and MP3 player -- is not likely going to "degrade" sound quality, and with careful choices, not likely to have interference from stations nearby on the frequency spectrum. You might expect something like that on "long trips". So? Switch to the Bluetooth receiver!
As I said on another thread, I've seen a demonstration of this FM-transmitter feature, and it does a good job.
As per another thread about car-audio "upgrades", I have an older pre-2000 OEM audio system -- 4-channel, 12-CD changer that I want to continue using. It has a cassette player!!! -- which offers to be a solution for upgrading the system to two-channel-stereo Bluetooth. Sound quality is great.
And -- I have my own purposes: Not only do I want to retain the old system with some peripheral upgrades, I want to use the FM-receiver so that it only functions with short-range reception. That is, I want to attenuate the reception where most people would want to make it more powerful.
The first thing I can think of doing is to simply remove the antenna connection to the car's external antenna. I see the possibility of then adding an auxiliary tuner which will replace the OEM's function for listening to FM radio. I can connect the antenna-coax to this auxiliary tuner.
Somehow, I'm under the impression that FM receivers disconnected from their spec antennae still function to receive very short-range transmissions. Is this true? If it isn't, I'd need to explore some simple method of attenuating the reception of the connected antenna.
ADDENDUM and UPDATE: I'm still interested in the answer to my question here -- What sort of short-range reception does an FM-receiver get with an unconnected antenna? But the reason I'm asking the question no longer has a compelling motive. Use of empty FM channels to get sound from an add-on Bluetooth-enabled FM-transmitter and MP3 player -- is not likely going to "degrade" sound quality, and with careful choices, not likely to have interference from stations nearby on the frequency spectrum. You might expect something like that on "long trips". So? Switch to the Bluetooth receiver!
As I said on another thread, I've seen a demonstration of this FM-transmitter feature, and it does a good job.
Last edited: