Here's the specs:
Blue(ish) Tbird 1.2 (100MHZ) AXHA open L1's!
KT7A-R, Crucial 133/3, Lapped and smeared Taisol, Antec 300W, 40C
fail-safe or optimal BIOS
Here's the problem:
Multipliers from 5 to 10.5 kill the system requiring unplug and CMOS clear (multipliers from 11 to 12.5 work fine and FSB's are good up to about 117x11=1300).
Here's what I've tried:
Scribbling all over the L1's - no change.
Plugging a scribbled Tbird 1.0 into the same system - works fine at all multipliers from 5-12 and will post but not boot at 12.5. The lower multipliers of course allow for any FSB up to 140 or so. 8.5x133=1133 is about the maximum all around setting at which it will boot from the RAID.
Here's what I've noticed:
1.2 1.0
L2 11 11
L3 1001 1001
L4 0101 1010
L5 1 1
L6 0001 1101
L7 11011 11011
L4(BP_FID) and L6(FID) are different and I suspect that maybe they are somehow limiting the multiplier range to 11-12.5. Is this possibly a new attempt by AMD to keep vendors from selling the 100MHz models as 133's while still allowing overclockers to underclock a little.
Anyone else experience this? Anyone know of a cure?
Blue(ish) Tbird 1.2 (100MHZ) AXHA open L1's!
KT7A-R, Crucial 133/3, Lapped and smeared Taisol, Antec 300W, 40C
fail-safe or optimal BIOS
Here's the problem:
Multipliers from 5 to 10.5 kill the system requiring unplug and CMOS clear (multipliers from 11 to 12.5 work fine and FSB's are good up to about 117x11=1300).
Here's what I've tried:
Scribbling all over the L1's - no change.
Plugging a scribbled Tbird 1.0 into the same system - works fine at all multipliers from 5-12 and will post but not boot at 12.5. The lower multipliers of course allow for any FSB up to 140 or so. 8.5x133=1133 is about the maximum all around setting at which it will boot from the RAID.
Here's what I've noticed:
1.2 1.0
L2 11 11
L3 1001 1001
L4 0101 1010
L5 1 1
L6 0001 1101
L7 11011 11011
L4(BP_FID) and L6(FID) are different and I suspect that maybe they are somehow limiting the multiplier range to 11-12.5. Is this possibly a new attempt by AMD to keep vendors from selling the 100MHz models as 133's while still allowing overclockers to underclock a little.
Anyone else experience this? Anyone know of a cure?