brianmanahan
Lifer
- Sep 2, 2006
- 24,394
- 5,841
- 136
What city do you live in?Unless you are tiny 3 drinks is nothing. Even 5 drinks over say 2 hours can be fine for most people to drive.
i would ask the guy i knew in real life who always told me it was fine, but a couple years ago he swerved while buzzed-driving his cycle over a hill and got killed.
also, this thread is giving me some serious deja vu.
Not everyone who drives to bars drinks or drinks to a point where it wouldn't be perfectly safe to drive away.
because I was selfish, short sited and a moron.
because I was selfish, short sited and a moron.
Whats funny is I had a total brain fart when I was in Brazil.
I got in the car with my in-laws who live in Brazil... and they start busting open beers all-around. It just totally befuddled me they could drink in a vehicle after living in the US where it's such a no-no.
edit: Maybe if we didn't condemn it so much people wouldn't be as inclined to disobey? Just a thought.
Even "buzzed driving" could end with you killing someone. the risk?
you do realize the sheer number of traffic fatalities that involve sober people right?
driving means you could kill someone
just wanted to point that out![]()
And, while all of that is true, willingly impairing yourself and then driving is beyond fucking retarded and should have harsh penalties.Personally I think that the dangers of drunk driving is over sensationalized. It has become a scapegoat for too much of the problems on the road, when the truth is the real problem is not that people drink and drive, it is that people don't take the responsibility of driving seriously in the first place.
I mean everyone gasps and clutches their pearls at the mention that someone might have been driving while under the influence of alcohol, but no one seems to think anything about driving around with a soda in one hand and a cell phone in the other, or steering a car at 80mph in a 60mph zone while talking on the phone and putting on eyeliner, or screaming at two kids while simultaneously trying to eat a taco and smoke a cigarette.
People are in such a hurry that they will risk the lives of themselves, their passengers, and everyone in the cars around them so not to have to wait 2 extra minutes at a red light. They will contribute to major backups on freeways so as to cut ahead three cars in a line of cars five miles long. They will pull out onto a road without enough room to get up to speed so they don't have to wait four minutes until the next gap large enough for their 12 year old oldsmobile to get up to speed in.
We have a problem much bigger than drunk driving.
And, while all of that is true, willingly impairing yourself and then driving is beyond fucking retarded and should have harsh penalties.
Do you really think that any of those things in the second paragraph is not willingly impairing yourself? They are all offshoots of the same root cause. They are all the same thing. We don't take the dangers of driving seriously. Read any thread on here about speed limits to see this clearly.
Sam Kinison explained it
"We don't WANT to drink and drive ... But there's no other way to get the fucking CAR back to the HOUSE!! How are we supposed to get fucking home??!!"
I do not drink and drive BTW.
I think rudeguy is more clever than we give him credit for. He doesn't really care about the rationality and likely never had any DUI. He is stealthily baiting some unknown drunk driving morons to post and start a trolly flamewar!
Brilliant!
Sam Kinison explained it
"We don't WANT to drink and drive ... But there's no other way to get the fucking CAR back to the HOUSE!! How are we supposed to get fucking home??!!"
I do not drink and drive BTW.
Sam Kinison was killed when his car was hit head on by a drunk driver.
