• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Can someone explain this....?

Tillo

Member
Hmmmm.....was thinking about this today as I contemplate wire-tricking my current 1.6A @ 2.4 @ 1.70V setup to overcome the cold-booting problem

My "old" machine is with my brother - it is a Abit BF6 board with a Celeron 566A @ 850 - now, I know this was a VERY common and VERY easy & standard overlclock..many of you no doubt had one.

In my case, the 566A **had** to run at 1.85V to get it stable and to boot and run - anything less than 1.85V - it would not boot up..

Now....according to the cold-boot-motherboard-boot-up-voltage issue........motherboards apply the initial voltage at the CPU default [1.5V in the case of the 566A] ...... why then did I never **EVER** get any sort of cold-boot or warm-boot issues with the BF6 ? I mean this was a CPU that needed 1.85V to boot into windows, yet with only 1.5V supposedly on boot-up, it never-ever cold-or-warm-booted ?

Can anyone explain why this was the case ?

Or is it as simple as the BF6 provided the full selected voltage from start-up ?

If that is it, "why the @#$#" can a board that is 3 years old not have this problem, yet so many newer boards do ?

Food for thought !

Tillo
 
Back
Top