• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

can someone delete this thread?

Originally posted by: RaiderJ
I think the OP wanted attention, and very possibly this act was not done by a "friend".

absolutely, thats what i was thinking.
 
Originally posted by: RaiderJ
I think the OP wanted attention, and very possibly this act was not done by a "friend".

So we go around locking people up based on suspicians? I know you didn't say that, but that is what it would lead up too... Who knows if he did it or not, but why the distrust? Is that something you would do? But I think his fiend was cruel, very cruel. That isn't right no matter who it is, whether it be a serial killer or a rodent. Innocent or not, torture is wrong.
 
Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
Originally posted by: RaiderJ
I think the OP wanted attention, and very possibly this act was not done by a "friend".

So we go around locking people up based on suspicians? I know you didn't say that, but that is what it would lead up too... Who knows if he did it or not, but why the distrust? Is that something you would do? But I think his fiend was cruel, very cruel. That isn't right no matter who it is, whether it be a serial killer or a rodent. Innocent or not, torture is wrong.

That is just my gut feeling, nothing more. You don't find it odd that he knows so much detail about the actions of his "friend"? I certainly do.

And, no, suffocating a mouse like that is not something I would do. I prefer to feed mice to my tarantula.
 
Back
Top