Originally posted by: deadlyapp
xenon has more of a blue tint to it, as far as brightness, there isn't a huge difference. Sylvania silverstars are the best non-HID light out there IMO.
It's more of a ricey thing.
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
The Xenon lights on my old Audi were awesome, and they worked almost as well as the high beams work on most cars. It's too bad that they cost $1,400 EACH to replace them when I got into an accident
Originally posted by: Canai
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
The Xenon lights on my old Audi were awesome, and they worked almost as well as the high beams work on most cars. It's too bad that they cost $1,400 EACH to replace them when I got into an accident
That is precisely the reason I hate those lights. Oncoming cars blind the shit out of me if they have those blue bulbs.
Originally posted by: ja1484
Originally posted by: Canai
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
The Xenon lights on my old Audi were awesome, and they worked almost as well as the high beams work on most cars. It's too bad that they cost $1,400 EACH to replace them when I got into an accident
That is precisely the reason I hate those lights. Oncoming cars blind the shit out of me if they have those blue bulbs.
Who the hell cares about you? I can see better.
Note: I do not have HID lights in my POS '92 Accord.
Originally posted by: Aflac
Originally posted by: ja1484
Originally posted by: Canai
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
The Xenon lights on my old Audi were awesome, and they worked almost as well as the high beams work on most cars. It's too bad that they cost $1,400 EACH to replace them when I got into an accident
That is precisely the reason I hate those lights. Oncoming cars blind the shit out of me if they have those blue bulbs.
Who the hell cares about you? I can see better.
Note: I do not have HID lights in my POS '92 Accord.
You'd be more worried once my car is mashed with yours because I couldn't see where I was going.
Originally posted by: Aflac
Originally posted by: ja1484
Originally posted by: Canai
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
The Xenon lights on my old Audi were awesome, and they worked almost as well as the high beams work on most cars. It's too bad that they cost $1,400 EACH to replace them when I got into an accident
That is precisely the reason I hate those lights. Oncoming cars blind the shit out of me if they have those blue bulbs.
Who the hell cares about you? I can see better.
Note: I do not have HID lights in my POS '92 Accord.
You'd be more worried once my car is mashed with yours because I couldn't see where I was going.
Originally posted by: Argo
Why does everybody want them on their cars? Are they supposed to be brighter? Better looking or is it just a fad.
Originally posted by: Rubycon
HID lamps (they are actually metal halide lamps not short discharge Xenon lamps ) engineered by the manufacturer are perfectly acceptable. Aftermarket conversions are where the trouble crops up.
explained here
Also current laws limit watts not lumens. A lower Kelvin HID has efficacy of over 3.5 times that of a tungsten-halogen lamp! That will put a LOT of lumens down the road - and when the lamp is installed in a reflector designed for a filament and not an arc tube troubles arise with controlling these lumens. Proper cuttoff control is essential with higher lumen sources to prevent blinding oncoming drivers. Many of the retrofits use offshore components with higher color temperatures which makes the light very blue negating the visibility advantages of HID in the first place. I guess the kids with the farting tailpipes think it's hip.
Originally posted by: exdeath
Same reason people want things like sunroofs and chrome rims and more letters on their trunk lid. It's another acronym and buzzword to say they have that someone else doesn't.