can I use a Macro lense just like a 'regular' lense?

andylawcc

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
18,183
3
81
i just finished reading wiki's explanation of a Macro lense http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_lens. Correct me if I am wrong, a lense can be only considered a maco if it has at least 1:1 magnification.

Now, my question is, won't a Macro lens make perfect sense for Portraits? Or any type of photography that doesn't require a large DOF?
 

OdiN

Banned
Mar 1, 2000
16,430
3
0
I absolutely love my Canon 100mm macro for portraits - mainly headshot type ones.

It's a great portrait lens. Especially since it has such fine adjustment of focus.

But then I also really like the 50mm f/1.4 for portraits.
 

ZOXXO

Golden Member
Feb 1, 2003
1,281
0
76
Good info guys. I know the true macro lenses enjoy a reputation for sharpness but have never read/heard the slower than non-macro equivalents axiom.

Could factor into future purchase decisions.
 

angry hampster

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2007
4,232
0
0
www.lexaphoto.com
Frankly the focus speed isn't that big of a deal, but make sure you get a lens with a focus limiter switch. My sigma had one with three settings: 1) 1:1->1m, 2) 1m->infinity, 3) full

As long as I didn't have the limiter set to full, it would be perfectly usable in day-to-day stuff, especially outside. Color representation and out of focus areas looked better with my Sigma than any lens I've ever owned, including my L-series Canons. I really wish I hadn't have sold that lens. Highly recommend getting one if you're considering a macro.

More samples:
http://img.photobucket.com/alb...er/artistic/pride1.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/alb.../artistic/bugjune1.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/alb...tic/harleycalendar.jpg

 

ghostman

Golden Member
Jul 12, 2000
1,819
1
76
I've been considering selling my Canon 70-200mm F4L to get the Sigma 150mm macro. I enjoy taking macros once in a while and the F/2.8 on the sigma could be helpful for indoor portrait shots. My main concern really was the focusing speed. Hmm...