Can I haz your opinion on which watch looks better?

[oiprocs]

Edit: Consensus seems to be that #1 is okay, but #2 would be the obvious choice if it weren't gold.

#1:

#2

 

[Numenorean]

I don't like either. Never been a fan of leather bands. Gold doesn't look good on me and #1 looks like a womens watch.

 

[CRXican]

uno

 

[Dear Summer]

one

 

[ChaoZ]

Anything but gold; it looks so gaudy.

 

[lxskllr]

That's tough. I'd prefer the second, but in silver. I guess I'll vote for #2 anyway. I don't care for the bezel on #1.

 

[coldmeat]

I agree, #1 kinda looks like a girls watch, but I would not get #2 because I just don't like how gold looks. Looks kinda tacky.

 

[MoPHo]

1 without the leather strap.

 

[Electric Amish]

If I had to buy one I would buy the first one, but I think it is a little large for my tastes.

 

[mcurphy]

#1 based on thae fact that #2 is yellow gold. I don't like yellow gold at all.

 

[IronWing]

Get the second one. It gives you stuff to play with during boring classes/meetings.

 

[Terabyte]

Out of these two options, #1.

 

[PM650]

#1, but I wouldn't wear either. Silver version of #2 + metal band would be closer to what I would get.

 

[hclarkjr]

#2

 

[uli2000]

I'd probably do #1. #2 is nice, but the dial seems so much more cluttered due to the chronograph. Gold isnt tacky and would look nice on either watch.

 

[YOyoYOhowsDAjello]

#2. You want as much information possible about how long you've been loitering at a particular location.