Originally posted by: kukyfrope
Not a bad deal if you maybe want to use it as a walking cane.
I don't understand why you would put a piece of equipment on a tripod this cheap. You paid how much for your digital still camera, $200, $300, probably more for a consumer camcorder? And you're going to trust it to not fall on a $10 tripod?
Originally posted by: bman46
Originally posted by: kukyfrope
Not a bad deal if you maybe want to use it as a walking cane.
I don't understand why you would put a piece of equipment on a tripod this cheap. You paid how much for your digital still camera, $200, $300, probably more for a consumer camcorder? And you're going to trust it to not fall on a $10 tripod?
Its a tripod, unless your strapping the tripod on top of a racecar at the indie 500 I wouldnt worry about it.
Originally posted by: kukyfrope
Not a bad deal if you maybe want to use it as a walking cane.
I don't understand why you would put a piece of equipment on a tripod this cheap. You paid how much for your digital still camera, $200, $300, probably more for a consumer camcorder? And you're going to trust it to not fall on a $10 tripod?
Originally posted by: McPhreak
Originally posted by: bman46
Originally posted by: kukyfrope
Not a bad deal if you maybe want to use it as a walking cane.
I don't understand why you would put a piece of equipment on a tripod this cheap. You paid how much for your digital still camera, $200, $300, probably more for a consumer camcorder? And you're going to trust it to not fall on a $10 tripod?
Its a tripod, unless your strapping the tripod on top of a racecar at the indie 500 I wouldnt worry about it.
He's just bitter he paid more for his tripod than he did his camera.
Seriously though, most people need a tripod just to keep the camera still and for panoramas. A $14 three-legged swiveling object is all that's necessary for me.
