• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Camcorder vs Camera, Canon vs Others?

Shadowjump

Junior Member
Hi, I currently have a Canon Legria HF200 (Vixia) and a Canon PowerShot SX200 IS.

Since I am not using the camcorder a lot (perhaps once, or twice a year?) I was thinking to sell it (and the SX200 IS) and get a good camera. I am not saying the SX200 IS is not good, it still serves me well, but I could use a newer model.

Thing is, whats the point of having a camcorder when a camera (SX280 IS) has FullHD recording (and 60FPS i think? or is it 50FPS for the PAL version?)?. Is there something really big that I will miss from my camcorder when recording videos?

I was thinking about the SX280 IS (I want the GPS feature). Has a good zoom and the "simple advanced" features I want like EV and exposure time. And of course HDR which I use a lot on my phone. Also, I saw the SX50 which has the features I want:

  • HDR
  • Full HD recording
  • 50x zoom (oh yeah!)
  • EV and exposure
What extra features does the SX50 have? Is it worth it the extra $$$ (apart from the zoom)

I am no serious photographer. I dont play a lot around with ISO settings and stuff. I just like to take good pictures when I am going on trips (usually 3-4 times a year)

And last question is, since I am a Canon "fanboy" and have no idea about other companies, are there any "better" cameras out there? Perhaps the Panasonic TZ40?

Thank you.
 
The SX50 will be the best bridge camera - but it has no GPS. Otherwise, it's apretty capable camera, with great zoom and 1080p video + stereo sound. I know Panasonic also has some great superzooms, but I like the convenience of the adjustable/rotating LCD screen.
 
Just got the SX50 yesterday... very very impressive. I'm also not big into photography. The main selling point was the stupid zoom: 50x and up to 200x with digital.

Other selling points may be the ability to take RAW images, a rotatable LCD screen, and a ton of other features I know nothing about. It has a digital view finder if it matters, a got shoe for adding a flash.

Only bad thing is that this is a big camera with no automatic lens cap. Pretty big issue for someone with no experience using DSLRs.

The SX280 is probably more than fine for what you want. I almost got the SX260 last year, but decided that I didn't want or need the GPS feature. There's only a $70 price difference between the SX50 and SX280 right now at a national chain store.
 
Back
Top