• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Camaro convertible concept

i hope the final product looks just as good... GM has a long history of fvcking up concept cars...
 
I think a roll bar or at least a style bar would help with the looks. Just like Mustangs, without a style bar, it jsut seems a bit plain and empty.
 
Originally posted by: mwmorph
I think a roll bar or at least a style bar would help with the looks. Just like Mustangs, without a style bar, it jsut seems a bit plain and empty.
Click to expand...

The car is better without a roll bar. The reason the Mustang has it is due to structural integrity. Remove the B and C pillars on a Mustang and the car would fold in like a taco without the bar in a major accident.
 
this car is about 4 years too late.


plus, it looks huge.


the interior looks decent, i bet the fvck it up
 
Originally posted by: AdamK47 3DS
Originally posted by: ElFenix
this car is about 4 years too late.


plus, it looks huge.


the interior looks decent, i bet the fvck it up
Click to expand...

Oh yeah, how much?
Click to expand...

unfortunately, that is far too subjective to actually bet on.
 
American convertibles suffer from cowl shake (Google it), big time. My GF's 2002 Camaro did. On a rough road it was a Flexy Flier 😛
The only convertible GM produces that has a ridged chassis is the Corvette. Do note how wide & high it's door sills are 😉
 
Originally posted by: AdamK47 3DS
Originally posted by: mwmorph
I think a roll bar or at least a style bar would help with the looks. Just like Mustangs, without a style bar, it jsut seems a bit plain and empty.
Click to expand...

The car is better without a roll bar. The reason the Mustang has it is due to structural integrity. Remove the B and C pillars on a Mustang and the car would fold in like a taco without the bar in a major accident.
Click to expand...

? The Mustangs dont have 1 but with 1 I think it looks better.

Ignore the fact that the first has a ugly body kit but the profile and head on views always look better with a style/light/roll bar
http://www.wickedbodies.net/01-gt/gt-4.jpg
http://www.auto-broker-magic.com/images/965c.jpg

Without a roof or style bar, theres nothing to break up the boring line from the windshield all the way to the trunk and the car looks boring and a little without substance without one.
 
Roll bars are so fugly on Vert's.

Also I never really like the look of camero's anyway, but that is pretty ugly. The nose looks a lot like the 2009 Mustang (which is based of the old shark nose in the 60's.)
 
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Roll bars are so fugly on Vert's.

Also I never really like the look of camero's anyway, but that is pretty ugly. The nose looks a lot like the 2009 Mustang (which is based of the old shark nose in the 60's.)
Click to expand...

Best looking new muscle car with pin stripes 😛
 
hey, awesome, looks like they are keeping those four rectangular gauges just in front of the gear lever.

I really liked those about the first concept.
 
I think the retro look should be retired (if done right, then keep). The car looks nice if it was introduced today, I'd get rid of the front end, pure fugliness IMO.
 
I cannot wait to see what Pontiac does with with the stying 😀
Always love Pontiac's visuals over Chevrolet's, and a Trans Am with Ram air version I bet will kill the Camero stylings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top