Call for civility

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,147
34,453
136
This should make you happy, a game where you can kill Palin, Koch bros, Gingrich, Hannity, O'Reilly and many other Conservatives and/or Republicans. Wow what fun, does it really matter that they get called "zombies", nice recognizable faces. Yeah civility.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/276418/tea-party-zombies-must-die-daniel-foster
Nothing new under the sun. There was a mod pack for Doom that had Bill Clinton's head replacing one of the monsters. He would chase you through the maze spitting fatal "tax" and "spend" balloons. If you shot him, he would wince. To the Clinton voter it was hilarious.
 

monovillage

Diamond Member
Jul 3, 2008
8,444
1
0
Lol @ National Review Online. Sounds like you are an outrage junkie

Compared to the lame comments that others were complaining about in this thread the one i posted with the link from *gasp* National Review is orders of magnitude worse. No outrage on my part, i'm more concerned about the 1st Amendment being castrated in regards to political speech, but i did get some chuckles from the hypocrisy from the left and their finger pointing about what was worse.
 

FerrelGeek

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2009
4,669
266
126
The targets on a map thing is silly, I agree. Not rationalizing, but both parties do it; I've seen a similar map for the dems. Sadly, we're living in an increasingly polarized, overcharged political world right now. I honestly am very concerned about mob politics. Mobs can be brutal, unthinking entities capable of doing great harm - irrespective of ideology.

All that being said, I'm still concerned about the impact of Hoffa's words. I'm a fair bit older thant the average poster on here (52). I remember the behavior of unions in the 60's and early 70's. Things could get very ugly when they didn't get their way. One of my college roommates bragged about a union strike where they vandalized the plant, burned a company helicopter and shot guard dogs. The Ohio National guard had to be called in to handle a violent Teamsters strike in 1970. I'm certainly not condemning all union members, but the memory of those incidents remain with me. And Jimmy Jr.'s dad was a wholly unsavory character, btw.

I think that Obama has a real opportunity to show some leadership in calling for civility, even to the point of publicly reprimanding Hoffa for his poor choice of words.

And lastly, thank you for your well stated and courteous reply.

Indeed. I do know Nick's posting history well, and you're right, he is being a hypocrite. When I see you expressing similar outrage at countless comparable --and often much worse -- comments from right wing leaders, I will agree you're not being equally hypocritical. Did you condemn Palin's cross-hairs map, for example?

Hoffa's word were ill-considered, and are easy to twist out of context. On that basis he should have made his point differently. It is quite clear from context, however, there was no intention to suggest violence. For Nick to rage otherwise is empty partisan theater on his part. I sincerely doubt there is a single person here who didn't realize this.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
You fuck with my means of providing for my family and I'd be surly too. Fuck with it too much and your physical well being would be in jeopardy. Don't try to hurt their means of supporting their family and you have nothing to worry about.
Funny how that works. Asking that public sector workers pay a bit of their own benefits costs (notably less than the average of the people whose taxes pay for those benefits) and removing their ability to have someone else negotiate fatter benefits on their behalf is considered to be fucking with their ability to provide for their families. Well, news flash - demanding higher taxes to provide them a sweeter deal than those who fund them is also considered to be fucking with taxpayers' ability to provide for their families, which is why taxpayers are also surly.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
Interesting stuff in this thread... anyway I am off to play a little "tea party zombies must die" on my PC... time for me to go wipe out some GOP candidates.
 

IBMer

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2000
1,137
0
76
Lol at all the Fox News zombies just posting what they hear over there all day long.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,812
6,777
126
Funny how that works. Asking that public sector workers pay a bit of their own benefits costs (notably less than the average of the people whose taxes pay for those benefits) and removing their ability to have someone else negotiate fatter benefits on their behalf is considered to be fucking with their ability to provide for their families. Well, news flash - demanding higher taxes to provide them a sweeter deal than those who fund them is also considered to be fucking with taxpayers' ability to provide for their families, which is why taxpayers are also surly.

Yup, what would be fair is that nobody all had union protection instead of just some people and everybody made the minimum wage, everybody, that is, except the owners of production, all of whom should get 50 million in bonuses.
 

a777pilot

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2011
4,261
21
81
Kill all TEA Party members!

Kill all conservitives!

Kill all Republicans!

Kill all rich people!


The bombing starts tomorrow.
 

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,587
126
So he clearly says to use your vote, and the right says this is violence? I mean, I know they want to disenfranchise, but to try to make the left believe that voting is violence is a stretch. Because that's what you're doing right? I mean it's so far beyond obvious that he was saying to vote, so you're trying to convince the left that voting is violence right? Or am I reading this thread wrong and the American right is so unbelievably fucking stupid as to not understand how to read the complete context of something before judging it and believes he was making a call for violence? No, impossible, even the right isn't that completely and totally fucking retard level stupid!

Then again, the level of stupidity from the right does constantly seem to keep increasing. I've seen two people in this thread already not grasp that the Democrat party was once the conservative party and when they did all those horrible anti minority things they were led by many of the same people who held beliefs that are now staunchly Republican beliefs.

It's threads like this that make me unable to take conservatives seriously. Y'all are REALLY fucking stupid. Like SUPER DUPER stupid if you actually believe some of the shit you've posted in this thread.
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
If a liberal makes an outrageous comment, liberals on these forums defend, deflect, or downplay. Conservatives attack, inflate, and criticize.

If a conservative makes an outrageous comment, conservatives on these forums defend, deflect, or downplay. Liberals attack, inflate, and criticize.

Yes, it's really that predictable and boring.

Just FYI.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,409
14,805
146

a777pilot

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2011
4,261
21
81
Why are we debating civility on politics anyway? It will never happen. It has never happen in recorded history. It is what it is. Deal with it.
 

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,587
126
Why are we debating civility on politics anyway? It will never happen. It has never happen in recorded history. It is what it is. Deal with it.

How dare you say something that I agree with! Go back to saying things I'm adamantly opposed to right this minute!