Chaosblade02
Senior member
- Jul 21, 2011
- 304
- 0
- 0
Jimmy Hoffa? Wtf? That dude has been long gone. They still never found his body. The mafia probably gave him a pair of concrete boots and became fish food.
No, you are right. I just agreed with you in my last post. Why, just last week we had our final golf tournament. My team captain said the same thing before the start: 'Let's take these sons of bitches out!' I instinctively knew exactly what he meant. I went to my car, opened the trunk, got my shotgun, and blew the other team's heads off.So just so we are clear, there is nothing wrong at all with what he said? Perfectly acceptable, especially after the call for civility? At the very least, you find nothing wrong with publicly calling a politcal opponent a son of a bitch?
Oh I remember the call for civility. I also remember Obama and company lashing out at Bush's deficits. My how the tables turn.
Now they say the country cannot function without at least more than $2 trillion a year in deficit. They actually think it's a matter of life or death to jump off the cliff with our currency. They may be correct, but in the wrong direction. They are forcing us off a cliff to our doom. Now they say this in their attempt to ensure it.
They want extreme action to match their extreme rhetoric.
Like the millions of conservatives that hope for a government breakdown so they can put their gold stockpile and guns to the test?Liberals are the most uncivilized people on the planet. Big suprise........
Ah, so that response is justified. Good to know.
Also, thanks for the veiled Godwin.
LOL, yeah James Hoffa now, but I'm sure he learned some lessons from daddyJimmy Hoffa? Wtf? That dude has been long gone. They still never found his body. The mafia probably gave him a pair of concrete boots and became fish food.
Are you serious man? You honestly think there is nothing out of line with that statement?
Surely you jest.
FWIW it's "sons of bitches" not "son of a bitches."
Meh. My version was more fun.
faux news faux outrage... what else would I expect?
I'm with you Nick. Especially for someone in a high-profile leadership position like that, that's an outrageous comment. It sets a very poor example ... for proper English grammar. It clearly should have been sons-of-bitches, NOT son-of-a-bitches. Wow.
But as far as an implied threat is concerned, lulz. Get real. Given that he mentioned voting just a sentence or two earlier, it is obvious even to knuckle-dragging union "thugs" that he meant take them out at the ballot box. But by all means rage on.
![]()
Are you serious man? You honestly think there is nothing out of line with that statement?
Surely you jest.
faux news faux outrage... what else would I expect?
"Tea Party groups roundly condemned Teamsters President Jimmy Hoffa after he called on union supporters unhappy with congressional Republicans to "take these son-of-a-bitches out."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/09/06/tea-party-groups-condemn-hoffa-sob-remark/
Oh, and "Asked about Hoffa's comments Tuesday, Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz declined to condemn them."
lol.
Call for civility, remember???
You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. And in fact Thomas Jefferson said it's good for a country to have a revolution every 20 years.
I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country around? I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out.
Indeed. I do know Nick's posting history well, and you're right, he is being a hypocrite. When I see you expressing similar outrage at countless comparable --and often much worse -- comments from right wing leaders, I will agree you're not being equally hypocritical. Did you condemn Palin's cross-hairs map, for example?Whether people like it or not, perception is reality; get over it, dems. Anyone in a leadership role should be abundantly aware of how his/her words can be interpreted. Jimmy Jr's remarks, in that light, are inexcusable. If a member of the tea party ever said what he said, every lib on this board would be in a shrieking, spitting, head-spinning rage. Hypocrisy ftw.
I assume both Fox News and you were equally angry when Tea Party candidate Sharron Angle said this:
How many times do you need to have it explained that deficits during economic up times and after massive crashes are not the same issues. Too many.
Indeed. I do know Nick's posting history well, and you're right, he is being a hypocrite. When I see you expressing similar outrage at countless comparable --and often much worse -- comments from right wing leaders, I will agree you're not being equally hypocritical. Did you condemn Palin's cross-hairs map, for example?
Hoffa's word were ill-considered, and are easy to twist out of context. On that basis he should have made his point differently. It is quite clear from context, however, there was no intention to suggest violence. For Nick to rage otherwise is empty partisan theater on his part. I sincerely doubt there is a single person here who didn't realize this.
