California's 9th U.S. Circuit Court says it's OK to force public school children to memorize and recite Muslim prayers.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Polish3d

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
5,501
0
0
Originally posted by: techs
This looks very fishy to me. I snooped around the web site and it seems to be a right wing wacko site that doubles as a financial site.

Oh, wait, here's another take on it:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/11/18/BAGLFFQENB1.DTL

During the history course at Excelsior School in the fall of 2001, the teacher, using an instructional guide, told the students they would adopt roles as Muslims for three weeks to help them learn what Muslims believe.

She encouraged them to use Muslim names, recited prayers in class and made them give up something for a day, such as television or candy, to simulate fasting during Ramadan. The final exam asked students for a critique of elements of Muslim culture.

U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton ruled in favor of the school district in 2003, saying that the class had an instructional purpose and that students had engaged in no actual religious exercises.

Gee, in a war on terrorism where the terrorists are primarily Muslim it might be a good thing to learn a little about the religion. In fact, Americans are so amazingly uneducated about the war that 75 percent(iirc) of people can't find Iraq on a map.

I find that characterization, if accurate, acceptable as a school exercise.

I think it is very wise to learn about muslim culture, and unwise to say "Why do we care what "they" think."

I mean seriously, why not learn?

 

Ronstang

Lifer
Jul 8, 2000
12,493
18
81
Originally posted by: Frackal

I find that characterization, if accurate, acceptable as a school exercise.

I think it is very wise to learn about muslim culture, and unwise to say "Why do we care what "they" think."

I mean seriously, why not learn?

In a twisted way I guess it is important to understand your enemy so you know how to defeat him.
 

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126

They should ask the students the definition of Sharia law and its compatibility with the separation of church and state.

They should ask the students why a progressive muslim country like Jordan still has the acceptance of honor killings in its laws and why it is defended as necessary because more lenient punishments will violate religious traditions and damage the fabric of Jordan's conservative society, where men have the final say. What traditions from what religion are they defending?

They should ask the students is open homosexuality acceptable in muslim countries.

They should ask the students is atheism compatible with Islam.

They should ask the students why in a so called christian country like the united states can college students under their first ammendment right exchange bibles for porn without worrying about what the college administration would say but when a college professor post cartoons about Muhammad she gets censored by the college administration

They should ask the students why one can openly display Piss Christ or Mary covered in elephant dung and the artists behind it can safely walk the streets but Salman Rushdie has to hide in the shadows for his works.

They should ask the students who Sayyid Qutb was and what did he find that prompted him to condemn America as a soulless, materialistic place that no Muslim should aspire to live in and what was his influence on todays radical Islamists.

They should ask the students why Islamists consider Western liberalism and secularism as their greatest threat not christianity or judaism

They should ask the female students how would they feel if the religious right in America was to impose a dress code on them just like in many Islamic countries.

They should ask the female students what they think of this quote from Saudia Arabia "There is no faster way to corrupt nations than the emancipation of women ? that is getting her out on the street to entice men and ruin their morals,"

They should ask the students why many so called free speech advocates blamed Theo Van Gogh's death on himself like this magazine which called itself the Index of Censorship supposedly promoting free speech.

The greatest threat to Islam and the greatest threat from Islam is not christians or jews but Western liberalism and secularism but most secularists would cut off their nose to spite their face instead of admitting this.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,435
6,091
126
Originally posted by: 1prophet

They should ask the students the definition of Sharia law and its compatibility with the separation of church and state.

They should ask the students why a progressive muslim country like Jordan still has the acceptance of honor killings in its laws and why it is defended as necessary because more lenient punishments will violate religious traditions and damage the fabric of Jordan's conservative society, where men have the final say. What traditions from what religion are they defending?

They should ask the students is open homosexuality acceptable in muslim countries.

They should ask the students is atheism compatible with Islam.

They should ask the students why in a so called christian country like the united states can college students under their first ammendment right exchange bibles for porn without worrying about what the college administration would say but when a college professor post cartoons about Muhammad she gets censored by the college administration

They should ask the students why one can openly display Piss Christ or Mary covered in elephant dung and the artists behind it can safely walk the streets but Salman Rushdie has to hide in the shadows for his works.

They should ask the students who Sayyid Qutb was and what did he find that prompted him to condemn America as a soulless, materialistic place that no Muslim should aspire to live in and what was his influence on todays radical Islamists.

They should ask the students why Islamists consider Western liberalism and secularism as their greatest threat not christianity or judaism

They should ask the female students how would they feel if the religious right in America was to impose a dress code on them just like in many Islamic countries.

They should ask the female students what they think of this quote from Saudia Arabia "There is no faster way to corrupt nations than the emancipation of women ? that is getting her out on the street to entice men and ruin their morals,"

They should ask the students why many so called free speech advocates blamed Theo Van Gogh's death on himself like this magazine which called itself the Index of Censorship supposedly promoting free speech.

The greatest threat to Islam and the greatest threat from Islam is not christians or jews but Western liberalism and secularism but most secularists would cut off their nose to spite their face instead of admitting this.

I see a split in humanity between those who use reason, secular humanists, and those who know the absolute truth. The latter can be of any religion. People who are convinced they are absolutely right, are they not the real threat? A democracy filled with Christan's will establish Christian law. It has to no, since each Christian is dedicated to his one and only truth? The problem the religious have with secularism is the notion that truth is relative and therefore there are no absolutes. But how is religious absolutism any different than this. In religions there are millions on one and only truth, all absolute and all different. Secularism is simply more economical in that it cuts out all that bull sh!t.

The absolute truth isn't a product of words and thinking, but an act of 'Is'ness in which the only teaching is being.

The paradox of relative and absolute truth are resolved in being.

So there are two kinds of secularists, those who are convinced that they are right, the religious, and those whose religion is that all religion is relative. Neither knows a thing or should we say that each is stuffed full of phony knowing.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,435
6,091
126
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: Frackal

I find that characterization, if accurate, acceptable as a school exercise.

I think it is very wise to learn about muslim culture, and unwise to say "Why do we care what "they" think."

I mean seriously, why not learn?

In a twisted way I guess it is important to understand your enemy so you know how to defeat him.

My dear Sir, you are the enemy and you cannot defeat yourself because every act of self-abnegation is done at the behest of the ego. All attempts do defeat yourself are self deception. The answer is always 180 degrees from where you look. Your situation is totally without hope of self rescue. Nobody faces truth because it's painful. God only appears to those forsaken and abandoned on the cross. When the flames of hopelessness have burnt the self to ash and the wind blows it all away the Lover steps forth in the Light.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Religion and history are intertwined such that is nearly impossible to provide students an understanding of other cultures and ancient civilizations without some thought given to the spiritual.

However, public schools should not endorse or otherwise promote one religion over another...I see no problem with teaching kids about Islam...however, the approach utilized by this teacher does cross the line a bit:

She encouraged them to use Muslim names, recited prayers in class and made them give up something for a day, such as television or candy, to simulate fasting during Ramadan. The final exam asked students for a critique of elements of Muslim culture.
Can you imagine the backlash if the same teacher had students engage in Christian or Jewish prayers in a classroom, or engage in the rituals of those religions...like for instance asking these kids to fast during the Christian celebration of Lent.

While I doubt this little exercise would necessarily indoctrinate these kids into Islam, there should be a unified standard for how public schools handle the topic of any religion.

 

GDaddy

Senior member
Mar 30, 2006
331
0
0
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: zendari
"Praise be to Allah" is not a prayer?

Not in every context. Like if I say, "George W. Bush is an excellent fisherman.", its not always a compliment.

I guess "under god" isn't a prayer either.

Nope, but its an endorsement and acknowledgement of religion in that context. Its saying "one nation under god", in other words, that the United States is subject to the Christian god. Big difference between that and learning about mythology in humanities class.

Those pledges and early documents were written by Free Masons, for them god or the symbol "G" stood for the higher power, weather it be christian, buddah, or whoever. As time went on it became associated with the christian god, but that was not the original intent.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,435
6,091
126
Originally posted by: GDaddy
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: zendari
"Praise be to Allah" is not a prayer?

Not in every context. Like if I say, "George W. Bush is an excellent fisherman.", its not always a compliment.

I guess "under god" isn't a prayer either.

Nope, but its an endorsement and acknowledgement of religion in that context. Its saying "one nation under god", in other words, that the United States is subject to the Christian god. Big difference between that and learning about mythology in humanities class.

Those pledges and early documents were written by Free Masons, for them god or the symbol "G" stood for the higher power, weather it be christian, buddah, or whoever. As time went on it became associated with the christian god, but that was not the original intent.

The G is actually a Q that stands for Quran.

 

GDaddy

Senior member
Mar 30, 2006
331
0
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: GDaddy
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: zendari
"
Those pledges and early documents were written by Free Masons, for them god or the symbol "G" stood for the higher power, weather it be christian, buddah, or whoever. As time went on it became associated with the christian god, but that was not the original intent.

The G is actually a Q that stands for Quran.

Here is a link to Wikipedia

Its a G and if you read down you will see that it just stands for Supreme Being.
 

BriGy86

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2004
4,538
1
91
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: BriGy86
why is religion being taught in public schools in the 1st place?

Because 52% of America voted for it.

im curious, what political party do you vote for or agree with most?
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Originally posted by: BriGy86
why is religion being taught in public schools in the 1st place?

Well, some leftwingers want us to praise Allah, so they brought that in the curriculum.
 

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: BriGy86
why is religion being taught in public schools in the 1st place?

Well, some rightwingers want us to praise Jesus, so they brought that in the curriculum.

Corrected to reflect the reality of the Fundie movement vs. Education in the United States.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,862
84
91
its fine as long as they point out all the deeply imbedded bigotry contained within islam. the intolerance especially of homosexuals and other religions, especially those not of the book, the oppression, the foul mixture of church and state, the horrible example mohammed set for his followers. you know, just to be fair and balanced as its taught as "history" not religion. ahem. basically its an ideology that contains everything a liberal school teacher should be against.
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: BriGy86
why is religion being taught in public schools in the 1st place?

Well, some rightwingers want us to praise Jesus, so they brought that in the curriculum.

Corrected to reflect the reality of the Fundie movement vs. Education in the United States.

Clearly, not in California.

Maybe we should chant "praise be to Jesus", after all that should be ok with even you. Oh, and recite a few Leviticus passages along with the Koran.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
This seems like an on-topic hypothetical question related to this case - what if kids were asked to take a "religious studies" course in High School? The course would educate and instruct the kids in every world religion and in no way advocated or favored any one particular religion over the others. So assuming all of that, would you . . .

1.) Would you approve of a school board who decided to implement this sort of requirement?

2.) Would you approve of the described activities in the OP if it took place in the context of this course?
Damn. No takers? Come on answer the two questions, it'll only take a sec. :)
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
This seems like an on-topic hypothetical question related to this case - what if kids were asked to take a "religious studies" course in High School? The course would educate and instruct the kids in every world religion and in no way advocated or favored any one particular religion over the others. So assuming all of that, would you . . .

1.) Would you approve of a school board who decided to implement this sort of requirement?

2.) Would you approve of the described activities in the OP if it took place in the context of this course?
Damn. No takers? Come on answer the two questions, it'll only take a sec. :)

You're opening pandora's box; keeping such a program clean of bias would be difficult at best.
 

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: BriGy86
why is religion being taught in public schools in the 1st place?

Well, some rightwingers want us to praise Jesus, so they brought that in the curriculum.

Corrected to reflect the reality of the Fundie movement vs. Education in the United States.

Clearly, not in California.

Maybe we should chant "praise be to Jesus", after all that should be ok with even you. Oh, and recite a few Leviticus passages along with the Koran.

Hey, if its in the context of Humanities class, and not presented as fact, then fine.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
This seems like an on-topic hypothetical question related to this case - what if kids were asked to take a "religious studies" course in High School? The course would educate and instruct the kids in every world religion and in no way advocated or favored any one particular religion over the others. So assuming all of that, would you . . .

1.) Would you approve of a school board who decided to implement this sort of requirement?

2.) Would you approve of the described activities in the OP if it took place in the context of this course?
Damn. No takers? Come on answer the two questions, it'll only take a sec. :)

You're opening pandora's box; keeping such a program clean of bias would be difficult at best.

It would. But this is a hypothetical question where we can ignore granular details like that for the moment. Let's assume they can keep it as balanced as humanly possible. Not Fox News Channel balanced, but really balanced.
 

jimkyser

Senior member
Nov 13, 2004
547
0
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
It would. But this is a hypothetical question where we can ignore granular details like that for the moment. Let's assume they can keep it as balanced as humanly possible. Not Fox News Channel balanced, but really balanced.
Define every. Do you talk about the varying versions of Christianity? or Shiite vs. Sunni Muslims? What about the three major subsets of Jewish religion? Then lets throw in all of the mystical religions. You'd never be able to cover them all AND give all of them equal time. For one thing, very little is known about some religions, even very publicized ones like Scientology.

I personally wouldn't have a problem with it, especially as a senior year elective. I went to schools run by the Christian Reformed Church, K-12. In our junior year we were required to take a class called Reformed Doctrine. The major point of the class was to tell us about the doctrine of the CR church. But they also spent several weeks comparing the CR doctrines to those of other Christian denominations as well as some of the major non-Christian ones. Of course there was bias and a concentration on the negative aspects of the other religions, but I did learn some interesting stuff.

I do not think it should be required, though and I think the Courts in this case are being very hypocritical even though I think the pledge should go back to the way it was before 'under God' was added.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: jimkyser
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
It would. But this is a hypothetical question where we can ignore granular details like that for the moment. Let's assume they can keep it as balanced as humanly possible. Not Fox News Channel balanced, but really balanced.
Define every. Do you talk about the varying versions of Christianity? or Shiite vs. Sunni Muslims? What about the three major subsets of Jewish religion? Then lets throw in all of the mystical religions. You'd never be able to cover them all AND give all of them equal time. For one thing, very little is known about some religions, even very publicized ones like Scientology.

I personally wouldn't have a problem with it, especially as a senior year elective. I went to schools run by the Christian Reformed Church, K-12. In our junior year we were required to take a class called Reformed Doctrine. The major point of the class was to tell us about the doctrine of the CR church. But they also spent several weeks comparing the CR doctrines to those of other Christian denominations as well as some of the major non-Christian ones. Of course there was bias and a concentration on the negative aspects of the other religions, but I did learn some interesting stuff.

I do not think it should be required, though and I think the Courts in this case are being very hypocritical even though I think the pledge should go back to the way it was before 'under God' was added.

Okay, you're right - make it an elective for High School Seniors. My point was that it probably is beneficial to have kids learn at least a little about the world's various religions (and yes I mean every) at least so they have a reference point when discussing world events and unrest, etc. I think even within the context of such a class, the lessons being taught at Byron Union School District seem a little over the top in my opinion. They should really dial it down a bit. Perhaps the teachers thought it would make the class more interesting, I don't know. In any event, if the kids left with a broad knowledge of the world's religions, it would probably serve them well on many levels.

But remember, the point is to educate not indoctrinate.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: Frackal

I find that characterization, if accurate, acceptable as a school exercise.

I think it is very wise to learn about muslim culture, and unwise to say "Why do we care what "they" think."

I mean seriously, why not learn?

In a twisted way I guess it is important to understand your enemy so you know how to defeat him.

Just as it is important to understand that not everyone of a particular race or religion is your enemy.

The fact is that we are painfully ignorant of the Islamic world, and whatever the reasons, I think we can mostly agree that being ignorant of a large religious and cultural group is never a good idea.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
Religion and history are intertwined such that is nearly impossible to provide students an understanding of other cultures and ancient civilizations without some thought given to the spiritual.

However, public schools should not endorse or otherwise promote one religion over another...I see no problem with teaching kids about Islam...however, the approach utilized by this teacher does cross the line a bit:

She encouraged them to use Muslim names, recited prayers in class and made them give up something for a day, such as television or candy, to simulate fasting during Ramadan. The final exam asked students for a critique of elements of Muslim culture.
Can you imagine the backlash if the same teacher had students engage in Christian or Jewish prayers in a classroom, or engage in the rituals of those religions...like for instance asking these kids to fast during the Christian celebration of Lent.

While I doubt this little exercise would necessarily indoctrinate these kids into Islam, there should be a unified standard for how public schools handle the topic of any religion.

I don't know...just playing Devil's advocate here (how appropriate ;)), Islam is NOT like other religions in this country. Most public school children know a HUGE amount about the major religions in the US and next to nothing about Islam. Our culture is very oriented towards Christianity already, there is no need for a public school to provide perspective on the Christian faith, most kids get enough of that already. Islam, however, is not well represented in our culture. While I disagree with the extent the school took the idea, I also disagree with the idea that we don't have more to learn about Islam than we do about Christianity.