Californians How Do You Plan To Vote On the Propositions.

Discussion in 'Politics and News' started by DCal430, Nov 6, 2012.

  1. zinfamous

    zinfamous No Lifer

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    75,271
    Likes Received:
    491
    I've yet to meet a single DP supporter that does not believe that the death of one innocent invalidates the DP entirely. I guess there is a first for everything.

    Also funny: the majority of supporters tend to be self-described Christians...hilarious. :D
     
  2. blankslate

    blankslate Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,121
    Likes Received:
    4
    Well people looking into what they eat should be a conversation that we have even if most GMOs or perhaps all don't have unexpected effects on people.

    However, I've heard stories involving GMO foods or more specifically the plants they are harvested from having unintended consequences.

    I won't repeat them because I've only heard it from one source and finding links to stories about this subject as they apply to countries outside the U.S. that are direct links from news sites isn't easy.

    However, what does happen if a GMO plant cross pollination with other plants? I've heard of Monsanto being worse than Apple when a plant they cooked up ends up somewhere where it wasn't supposed to be because of this.
     
  3. zinfamous

    zinfamous No Lifer

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    75,271
    Likes Received:
    491
    I've gotten into this before, in several other threads unrelated to this prop, but on the subject:

    selective breeding is not the same as site-specific genetic modification. I really don't want to get into it right now--have to go deal with my ribosomal libraries cooking on my bench right now--but suffice to say, I deal with transgenic organisms on a daily basis.

    Mendelian genetics is completely irrelevant to this discussion.
     
  4. Yreka

    Yreka Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2005
    Messages:
    4,084
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here are the actual numbers:

    http://donor-demo-cir.herokuapp.com/groups/

    A bit more telling than the PBS link especially when you look at the top contributor, margin, and some of the "corporations" in the top 10. ( not a shot at PBS, they were attempting to summarize, but it does merit some further evaluation IMO)

    Also, if you look at the spending on the prop, the "against" outstrips the "for".. Sure you can say "well of course, they are protecting their interests". Problem with that (if we are operating under the assumption that Corps have an "unfair spending advantage" already, and this would increase it) is why don't we see them really giving a shit WRT to prop 32?

    It just doesn't pass the smell test to me.. Voting Yes.
     
  5. Yreka

    Yreka Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2005
    Messages:
    4,084
    Likes Received:
    0
    I just don't see it that way I guess.. Why do you think there would be MORE money if 32 passes ? Shouldn't there be less because these "2 or 3 people" are unopposed ?

    Its a "money in politics" problem... You may look at 32 as a boon, I look at it like a building block, maybe this moves CTA off the list as the current #1, and now we have a corp or super pac up there next, and we can focus on removing that influence as well.
     
  6. ichy

    ichy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Messages:
    6,939
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm an atheist. I kind of agree with the satanist take on turning the other cheek though: "A Satanist practices the motto, "If a man smite thee on one cheek, smash him on the other!" Let no wrong go unredressed."
     
  7. ichy

    ichy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Messages:
    6,939
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe we should abolish incarceration as well. After all, an innocent person might be stabbed to death in prison.
     
  8. BudAshes

    BudAshes Lifer

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2003
    Messages:
    10,095
    Likes Received:
    14
    Prop 37 is a joke, don't vote for it.
     
  9. ivwshane

    ivwshane Lifer

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    15,293
    Likes Received:
    77
    What's wrong with prop 31?

    Transparency = good
    Offsets for tax increases or revenue decreases sounds good too.
    Publication of proposed laws at least three days before vote also sounds good.
    Allows local governments to implement a law in their own way as long as it gets the same results: sounds good and bad. Good because it gives more powe to local government in how they use their resources, it could be bad because it creates various versions of the same law that could be different from county to county.
    Requires review of state programs and setting performance goals: sounds good to me although I know it would cause an increase in administrative costs but if we have smarter programs wouldn't that be offset?
    I also like the part where they set aside time to actually review all the programs. To me that would create a lot of debate and bring out better public knowledge.


    I see some higher administrative costs but overall a lot more transparency and accountability.


    What am I missing?
     
  10. ivwshane

    ivwshane Lifer

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    15,293
    Likes Received:
    77
    My guy instincts tell me prop 34 will benefit private prisons especially when money must be set aside for police and investigations.

    Private prisons benefit from prison work and from a growing prison population.


    On a more personal level it seems like this law would be a big "* you" to people that had loved ones killed by someone who will now get to live out their life (in some cases it's a better life than before they were in prison).
     
  11. ivwshane

    ivwshane Lifer

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    15,293
    Likes Received:
    77
    35 seems unnecessary, very few people have gone to jail for this in the first place and yet it will require training for police which will cost more money.
     
  12. DCal430

    DCal430 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,961
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would have likely voted yes on 32 if it was only for Public Unions, as public workers already have strong protections according to the 14th Amendment.
     
  13. bfdd

    bfdd Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Messages:
    13,315
    Likes Received:
    0
    All corn is genetically modified it became it's current form through human manipulation.

    32 needs to pass I'm sick of being beholden to the Teachers Union. * them and their public schools. Education already takes over 40% of California's general budget. It'S obviously not enough to keep running the inefficient shitty education system we have now, but I fail to see how that is my responsibility to continue funding failure. Lack of school choice and competition over education dollars is stagnating the education industry(yes it's a fucking industry even public schools are selling a product, you're just forced to pay for it). I feel education costs can be cut by over half and quality up if we start opening up the industry to more private choice.
     
  14. CrystalBay

    CrystalBay Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2002
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Most tomatoes are modified also.
     
  15. redgtxdi

    redgtxdi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    5,397
    Likes Received:
    0
    For those late to the party and think Jerry's being honest about prop 30......

    http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/P...ng-3917833.php

    http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/...in-dishonesty/

    http://www.scpr.org/blogs/politics/2...opponents-say/

    The law itself deceives you. Prop 30 money simply displaces a like amount out of the general fund for Sacramento to do other stuff with. They have been lambasted by almost every major news media and then even Molly Monger and her prop 38 tax crowd (especially when she revealed the lies) since a couple weeks ago when the new ads came out. Because most people, even smart people who READ the law (like yourself) won't know that it just frees money up on the back end. Another version of "kicking the can".

    Just like Brown's train.

    Just like Villaraigoosegg's subway to the sea.

    They know that if they can earmark "more/extra" money in one place, that's enough to give them more money to play with elsewhere as they substitute these allocations.

    [size=+4]NO ON PROP 30!!!![/size]
     
  16. CrystalBay

    CrystalBay Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2002
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's a bullshit prop about the food labeling . It leaves many modified food products exempt from labeling.
     
  17. DLeRium

    DLeRium Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2001
    Messages:
    20,102
    Likes Received:
    2
    So life in prison of one innocent doesn't invalidate life in prison? Punishment of an innocent invalidates punishment overall? Arresting an innocent means we shouldn't ever arrest anyone? How far to you stretch it. Maybe we should do a better job with our legal system rather than worrying about punishments.

    The reason the DP is so costly and so time consuming is because we give it so much red tape and there's so many hurdles to cross to put someone to death. The act of the DP itself is very simple, and I believe it should stand. Just because our judicial system is broken and we don't clear people off Death Row quickly enough doesn't mean we end the death penalty. The correct solution is to look at why the hell does it take so long? If you wanted to you could get all the facts out on the table and done with very quickly.
     
  18. redgtxdi

    redgtxdi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    5,397
    Likes Received:
    0
    Correct! And at the same time, find out why it costs 3 times the amount per prisoner in California that it does in other states! ;)

    This state is so bass ackward it makes hell look like the Bahamas.
     
  19. CrystalBay

    CrystalBay Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2002
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Earmarking and Pork barreling that is the whole problem with our system.
     
  20. DCal430

    DCal430 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,961
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is a significant difference still between selective breeding or hybridization and genetically modified foods. Man has been selectivly breeding and hybridizing fruits and vegetables for thousands of years, this isn't the same as GMO foods that are less than 50 years old.
     
  21. zinfamous

    zinfamous No Lifer

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    75,271
    Likes Received:
    491
    very simple. It takes so long because the state putting someone to death is a very serious issue. With the long, long history of fraudulent criminal trials, the absolute assurance of guilt is a must.

    again, I don't know anyone that disagrees with this. It really doesn't matter why it is so expensive--the easiest solution is the only solution.

    End it, because it is, quite simply, morally reprehensible.

    the cost issue is only used to appeal to immoral justice hawks. When that doesn't work, it isn't really worth trying to convince someone otherwise, imo. :\

    DO I believe that some people commit such horrible acts that they forfeit their life value? Yeah...but I don't believe it is the state's right to kill them.
     
  22. AznAnarchy99

    AznAnarchy99 Lifer

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Messages:
    13,734
    Likes Received:
    5
    30 - Yes
    31 - No
    32 - No
    33 - Yes
    34 - No
    35 - Yes
    36 - Yes
    37 - Undecided
    38 - No
    39 - Yes
    40 - Yes

    Btw anyone who's in Los Angeles, vote no for on Measure B ;)
    Bring it on election day!
     
  23. Slew Foot

    Slew Foot Lifer

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    12,119
    Likes Received:
    23
    Looks like 30 and 38 are both behind so far. 39 is ahead, and the human trafficking thing is WAAAAAYYY ahead.
     
  24. DCal430

    DCal430 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,961
    Likes Received:
    0
    35 is a terrible law, that could have the adult children of prostitutes be charged and convicted of human trafficking.
     
  25. DucatiMonster696

    DucatiMonster696 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    4,267
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's a stretch.

    However its a bad law because consensual acts of prostitution could cause those who have nothing to do with human trafficking to be prosecuted by overzealous DA's under this law despite its original intentions.