California water rationing:50 gallons per person per day or $500 fine

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
I thought that water used in the home was more-or-less a closed loop system. I.e., the water goes into the sewage system where it is treated and then used again as fresh water. I.e., it's recycled. If so, this sort of restriction is stupid. Seems to me the water escaping, like that used to water the lawn or wash the car, is where the restriction needs to be.

Fern
 

peonyu

Platinum Member
Mar 12, 2003
2,038
23
81
50 Gallons is actually alot on a per person basis. Even showering with a 3 Gallon per minute showerhead equals out to a 6 minute shower using 18 gallons. That leaves 32 Gallons for water to drink, make food with, clean with etc. The problem arises with washing dishes or washing clothes, but it looks like this is a cumulative "limit", so if its a single person home, unless you party every day I dont see a need to use a fully loaded dish or clothes washer every day. Homes with more people will have the limit multiplied so washing clothes and dishes shouldnt be a problem. Its the dingbats who take 20 minute showers or leave the water faucet running just cause they are to lazy to turn it on and off while brushing their teeth that waste water.
 
Last edited:

iGas

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2009
6,240
1
0
Such calculations are unnecessary. The government limits showerheads to 2.5gpm. Really old units can run 5.5 gpm.
Hence old shower heads tend to not work as design, because most of the time the pressure is lower than the design minimum of around 3 GPM.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
50 Gallons is actually alot on a per person basis. Even showering with a 3 Gallon per minute showerhead equals out to a 6 minute shower using 18 gallons. -snip-

I suspect many of you making this claim that 50 gallons per day is a lot don't live with teenagers and women. I've seen my kid blow through 6 minutes of waters while he tries to wake up and get the water hot etc.

I also remember when I played a lot of sports and worked out a lot. I had two showers a day; one in the morning and one after working out.

personally I don't care what CA does. I don't live there and at my home I'm on a well. I can use whatever the h3ll I want.

Fern
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,418
1,595
126
Damn. I thought your claim was bogus.

I don't see how an unmetered system works.

Fern

his claim is still bogus. his claim was "major cities in CA are unmetered" which is false. The reality is some percentage of the population in these cities are unmetered.

don't get me wrong though, wtf's all around.
 
Last edited:

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,333
136
Most water usage studies take into account the water used to produce the products that people consume.
And Natural News? Dave has sunk to a new low.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
20,890
5,516
136
Damn. I thought your claim was bogus.

I don't see how an unmetered system works.

Fern

Most likely it's a flat rate paid monthly or attached to your property taxes. The reality is the water is free, it's getting it to your house that costs money. Once that infrastructure is in place, the only cost difference between moving a hundred or a thousand gallons of water is energy. The rest of the system carries the same overhead regardless of use.
 

Jerem

Senior member
May 25, 2014
303
38
91
I've had a well go dry and wound up living off of a 500 gallon tank I'd fill at the neighbors. The Mrs. and I would use about 40gals. each/day. We would wash clothes at a laundry mat, only flush when brown, navy showers. Now some of you city folk could easily get by with less. Hell, you could shower every other day and wear your clothes three or four times and no one would know the difference. By the sounds of it some of you don't even wait for your showers to get warm before diving in.. Everybody talks a great game but I haven't seen anybody actually post up a water bill (or summary of).
 

OverVolt

Lifer
Aug 31, 2002
14,278
89
91
If its yellow go out in the yard and kill some grass, if its brown go to the nearest store.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
27,493
26,514
136
I thought that water used in the home was more-or-less a closed loop system. I.e., the water goes into the sewage system where it is treated and then used again as fresh water. I.e., it's recycled. If so, this sort of restriction is stupid. Seems to me the water escaping, like that used to water the lawn or wash the car, is where the restriction needs to be.

Fern

You couldn't be more mistaken, there are very few water systems in the US that operate that way. Something about the fear of drinking pee water. Doesn't matter that in most places its dumped into a river where it is pulled into the next town's treatment system and turned drinking water.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
You couldn't be more mistaken, there are very few water systems in the US that operate that way. Something about the fear of drinking pee water. Doesn't matter that in most places its dumped into a river where it is pulled into the next town's treatment system and turned drinking water.

http://www.acwa.com/content/water-recycling/californias-water-water-recycling-imitates-nature

Many people associate the word “recycling” with glass bottles and aluminum cans, but the fact is California water agencies and communities have been recycling water for decades with great success. With scores of new recycling projects in the planning stages, the amount of water recycled in California is expected to greatly expand in the near future.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/01/world/from-toilet-to-tap-water/

Fern
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
27,493
26,514
136

Your first article focuses on using treated water as non-potable water which is not the same thing as the "closed" system you were speculating about. From the second article out of 1.3 billion gallons treated per day they are expanding to reclaim 100 million gallons per day to put back into the system. Still not exactly a closed loop when more than 90% isn't reclaimed and reused at the tap.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
Your first article focuses on using treated water as non-potable water which is not the same thing as the "closed" system you were speculating about.

Yeah, I'm aware of that. However, the in-home is captured and reused. The 'loss' would appear to occur in outdoor water use.

From the second article out of 1.3 billion gallons treated per day they are expanding to reclaim 100 million gallons per day to put back into the system. Still not exactly a closed loop when more than 90% isn't reclaimed and reused at the tap.

I read it a bit differently. They using a portion of the 1.3 billion gallons to generate 100 million gallons. I can't find a ration of sewage treated:reclaimed drinking water.

Instead it seems the system is small.

In any case, I was mistaken in that I initially thought CA was much more involved in recycling water. I added the link to show I wasn't just 'making up' the concept (i.e., you wrote I couldn't be "more wrong".)

Fern
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
27,493
26,514
136
Yeah, I'm aware of that. However, the in-home is captured and reused. The 'loss' would appear to occur in outdoor water use.



I read it a bit differently. They using a portion of the 1.3 billion gallons to generate 100 million gallons. I can't find a ration of sewage treated:reclaimed drinking water.

Instead it seems the system is small.

In any case, I was mistaken in that I initially thought CA was much more involved in recycling water. I added the link to show I wasn't just 'making up' the concept (i.e., you wrote I couldn't be "more wrong".)

Fern

I didn't say you were wrong about the concept just about it being used widely and assuming it was how municipal water systems worked.