Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: db
That's right folks--California is a terrible place. Don't come here! Or if you do, spend all your money then go back home. But leave your daughter for a few days.
heh
Oh, and don't forget to take a dozen illegal immigrants with you. We seem to have a bumper crop this year...
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: maddogchen
Originally posted by: Ronstang
You people start these threads all the time. Will you continue to start them when your state economcially and finacially implodes?
that would be very bad for the rest of the US too.
But then maybe I'll finally be able to afford a house here once everyone leaves.
It would not be as bad for the rest of the country as Californians think. Although CA is a huge economy it is for the most part self serving as it can only export goods and services that cannot be done cheaply elsewhere, and just about anywhere is cheaper to do anything than in CA.
CA has the 5th or 6th largest economy in the world actually.
yea. its funny how other states keep trying to steal away businesses through tax incentives and such for businesses because they can't generate their own😛 i still don't see ebay/intel/google/pixar/nvidia/apple/ilm etc etc etc trying to move to minnesota lol😉 all the successful business we have sorta explode the myth that cali is business hostile.
Originally posted by: kalster
Discuss
Originally posted by: astrocase
So you guys want assault rifles to overthrow the USA? You would need a lot more than that. When the constitution was written we didn't have tanks or nuclear weapons.
With that type of logic we should legalize tanks and fighter jets for civilians.
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: astrocase
So you guys want assault rifles to overthrow the USA? You would need a lot more than that. When the constitution was written we didn't have tanks or nuclear weapons.
With that type of logic we should legalize tanks and fighter jets for civilians.
when the 4th amendment was written there were quite a few other weapons besides 'arms,' (artillery, for one) and the 4th amendment clearly doesn't contemplate artillery (or else they would have said arms and artillery). and artillery was useful even back then.
but ya know... look at how much of a problem iraq is. and they don't have nuclear weapons or tanks. lots of people that can blend in with small arms are quite effective.
Originally posted by: fisher
i keep hearing california is going to slide into the ocean. can we get a move on with this? i'd like it to happen soon.