C2D versus my X2 boxes

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
With all the crap he spews and calls ppl liars....

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...atid=28&threadid=1954416&enterthread=y


note: I now have a E6400 at 3.43ghz...been running F@H solid for about a month...


besides the benches in the above thread where my dual core C2D annihilated 4 cores of the X2 and opterons...

In F@H...

WU 24xx'z...

X2 270's = 32-35mins per frame
X2 265's@2.5ghz = 28-30mins per frame
C2D E6300,6400,&E6600@3.4 = 14-16mins per frame

WU 2124,2125,2126

X2 270's = 50min per frame
X2 265's@2.5ghz = 42-44min per frame
C2D E6300,6400,&6600@3.4ghz = 23-26min per frame

Now these WUs take 24-40 hours on even my fast C2D systems...48-90+ on the AMD systems...that is more load then you do with that crap system of yours...


Every thing I do I feel the power of the C2D system. CAD rendering, encoding, dvdshrink, and Folding...
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,105
16,016
136
And Duvie and my numbers correspond exactly. I will be posting screen shots of dual F@H + dual orthos @ 3505 just for the person that is calling me a liar. I have been running this particular box @ 3466 for weeks, since it is stable at that, but I can do 3505 for at least a week. That should prove real stability.....

Edit. My boxes are a little warmer than Duvies, as I don't have as good of cooling, or cases, but so long as its under 60c, I am happy. I run 51 and 57 c on my 2 C2D's. Same temps on my X2's, but they put out data at 1/2 the speed of the C2D boxes.
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
I was a staunch AMD fan with several boxes...No Intel fanboy here as you claim of C2D fans....People see me scrap all of my quad boxes for dual core Intel boxes says volumes...

Also in 2 of my C2D boxes I run 2 instances of F@H at top temp of 41-43c.....Cool and quiet is how I explain my new C2D boxes...
 

Roguestar

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2006
6,045
0
0
OCHungry is an astro-turfing fool talking out of his astro. I don't see why we should even have to play his game but this proof is at least good for the people who would believe him instead of being objective about it.
 

HopJokey

Platinum Member
May 6, 2005
2,110
0
0
Man, you guys have a whole lotta computing power.

Heh that fellow OcHungry is quite the troll. But you must admit, if he is banned, things won't be as interesting in the CPU forum:)
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
There is enough newbs in here that could be mislead into his false facts...i would rather have him gone, and we can argue about something else...like K8l versus kentsfields
 

Roguestar

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2006
6,045
0
0
We don't need him BSing people into buying an 939 X2 system just because he think they're the badger's nadgers. ESPECIALLY NOT A 939 system given the upgrade dead-end. We just need him to stop talking noise and do the tests for himself like Duvie posted.
 

OcHungry

Banned
Jun 14, 2006
197
0
0
Originally posted by: Duvie
I was a staunch AMD fan with several boxes...No Intel fanboy here as you claim of C2D fans....People see me scrap all of my quad boxes for dual core Intel boxes says volumes...

Also in 2 of my C2D boxes I run 2 instances of F@H at top temp of 41-43c.....Cool and quiet is how I explain my new C2D boxes...

Look Heehaw, No need to get so bent out of shape you stuck up self loving show off.
Just show prime95 running at that speed ,not less than 12 hrs. I never doubt C2D can do those superficial benchmarks all in 32bit apps. Just doubt that it?s any good 24/7 and/or can be stable or sustain any stress without freezing on you. You never mentioned how long it took you getting those results. Was it about 150 reboots and 200 freeze ups?
Some people are so stuck up that when are put to test of human endurance/tolerance they blow up like a balloon full of hot air.
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Originally posted by: OcHungry
Originally posted by: Duvie
I was a staunch AMD fan with several boxes...No Intel fanboy here as you claim of C2D fans....People see me scrap all of my quad boxes for dual core Intel boxes says volumes...

Also in 2 of my C2D boxes I run 2 instances of F@H at top temp of 41-43c.....Cool and quiet is how I explain my new C2D boxes...

Look Heehaw, No need to get so bent out of shape you stuck up self loving show off.
Just show prime95 running at that speed ,not less than 12 hrs. I never doubt C2D can do those superficial benchmarks all in 32bit apps. Just doubt that it?s any good 24/7 and/or can be stable or sustain any stress without freezing on you. You never mentioned how long it took you getting those results. Was it about 150 reboots and 200 freeze ups?
Some people are so stuck up that when are put to test of human endurance/tolerance they blow up like a balloon full of hot air.



not even close!!! Took me like 2-3 days to find the spots and then I let them all run 12 hours of Small FFT and 12 hours of blend...MOst of them never froze once...I get an error in orths I adjust. I run F@H 24/7 as shown by my near 3000ppd average with 6 cores.....

I am not about to stop folding to prove anything to you...Plus you will be likely gone in the next 12 hours anyways...


It may sound like gloating, but it is just to shutup FUD spreaders such as yourself.....What does orthos show by the way. Your crap you were spewing was saying we wouldn't notice the performance...I just proved you to be the ignorant one on that claim...

How is DVDshrink a superficial benchmark? LOL....what a compete !@$%#^#

I guess you just change it to what ever makes you feel good about your second fiddle system....Go cry in your pillow!!!
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,105
16,016
136
I am going to shut down orthos, and do a F@H screen copy after 12 hours or more to shut him up (@ 3.5!)

Here is 3.5 (not for long though)

I will do F@H for a day or so, then re-post that pic. I don;t want to waste all that power on an idiot, so I shut down orthos to let F@H have all the cpu.. Even 7 minutes is not a suicide shot as he said I did. And again, this is on air cooling.
 

Roguestar

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2006
6,045
0
0
ROTATE ARGUMENT FREQUENCIES CAPTAIN

He's playing it again. Now he doesn't want your pathetic little 32-bit apps any more (ATTN: OcHungry; everyone uses 32-bit) and if you do manage to benchmark it and prove him wrong you're just showing off. Ban this troll.
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Originally posted by: Markfw900
I am going to shut down orthos, and do a F@H screen copy after 12 hours or more to shut him up (@ 3.5!)


I dont think he is intelligent enough to understand the stability that is required to run F@H and not get EEU's.....Run it for a few days...let 3-4 WUs to pass....

he evidently wasn't smart enough to read my benches above....

he said performance in the first thread, then he went to stability...He is all over the place trying to patch the holes in his losing argument...

 

OcHungry

Banned
Jun 14, 2006
197
0
0
If anyone to be banned is you for personal attacks and name callings.
I will report your foul language and I am sure the mods don?t care if you've been posted 100,000 more than anyone here. Rules are rules and you have evaded them too many times. Maybe you are lucky and Mr. Anand just gives you a Christmas vacation
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,105
16,016
136
Originally posted by: OcHungry
If anyone to be banned is you for personal attacks and name callings.
I will report your foul language and I am sure the mods don?t care if you've been posted 100,000 more than anyone here. Rules are rules and you have evaded them too many times. Maybe you are lucky and Mr. Anand just gives you a Christmas vacation

YOU ARE THE ONE THAT CALLED ME A LIAR. POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK.

YOU ARE THE ONE THAT NEEDS TO BE BANNED. I AM ONLY PROVING YOU WRONG.

SEE ABOVE PICTURE, MORE COMING YOU TROLL.
 

Roguestar

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2006
6,045
0
0
Originally posted by: OcHungry
If anyone to be banned is you for personal attacks and name callings.

but

Originally posted by: OcHungry
Heehaw, No need to get so bent out of shape you stuck up self loving show off.

Some people are so stuck up that when are put to test of human endurance/tolerance they blow up like a balloon full of hot air.

Originally posted by: OcHungry
Who the hell are you, harpoon or duvei that I must respect?

I hope by now you see where I am going and realize the gross exaggeration these stuck up morons [are] feeding the net.

 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Originally posted by: OcHungry
If anyone to be banned is you for personal attacks and name callings.
I will report your foul language and I am sure the mods don?t care if you've been posted 100,000 more than anyone here. Rules are rules and you have evaded them too many times. Maybe you are lucky and Mr. Anand just gives you a Christmas vacation


I doubt it, but try anyways....

They are well informed about who you are.... They only need to look at your last dozen post to see you offer nothing to this board.

I have the backing of likely 98% of the ppl here...Who has your back?
 

OcHungry

Banned
Jun 14, 2006
197
0
0
Originally posted by: Markfw900

Edit. My boxes are a little warmer than Duvies, as I don't have as good of cooling, or cases, but so long as its under 60c, I am happy. I run 51 and 57 c on my 2 C2D's. Same temps on my X2's, but they put out data at 1/2 the speed of the C2D boxes.
Confession time.
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,105
16,016
136
Originally posted by: OcHungry
Originally posted by: Markfw900

Edit. My boxes are a little warmer than Duvies, as I don't have as good of cooling, or cases, but so long as its under 60c, I am happy. I run 51 and 57 c on my 2 C2D's. Same temps on my X2's, but they put out data at 1/2 the speed of the C2D boxes.
Confession time.

Confession of what ? that they put out twice the data at the best OC on each ? Jeesh..

In case I wasn;t clear, the C2D's @ 3.43 put out twice the power of X2's @ 2.5
 

OcHungry

Banned
Jun 14, 2006
197
0
0
Originally posted by: Duvie


I have the backing of likely 98% of the ppl here...Who has your back?
You think so? You offend people in numerous occasions and you expect these members to support, because you're confident that they would.
I hope where you walk there wont be a puddle full of muddy water.

 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Originally posted by: OcHungry
Originally posted by: Duvie


I have the backing of likely 98% of the ppl here...Who has your back?
You think so? You offend people in numerous occasions and you expect these members to support, because you're confident that they would.
I hope where you walk there wont be a puddle full of muddy water.


Start a poll and find out....Other then me addressing you, find a recent post where I have offended someone? I found several examples from you within the last 3 threads you have posted where you were rude to members...

You help virtually no one in this board...I wonder who would be more missed...

I tell it to ppl straight up...even in that thread where you called ppl morons and liars I would have suggested AMD for that gentlemen.

MOst will recognize me for fair here. Considering I had only AMD's since AMD64 through X2's...I was called an iAMD fanboy then...You ppl need to make up your mind on what side I am suppose to be lieing for...
 

rise

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2004
9,116
46
91
Originally posted by: OcHungry
Originally posted by: Duvie


I have the backing of likely 98% of the ppl here...Who has your back?
You think so? You offend people in numerous occasions and you expect these members to support, because you're confident that they would.
I hope where you walk there wont be a puddle full of muddy water.
i don't like duvie's posting style and mark is useless imho.

however, duvie certainly contributes more than you do. say what you will about his abrasiveness but he knows what he talks about and backs it up with numbers. he's also no fanboy.

that said, calling out any member is wrong imo but if duvie hasn't been banned before for some of his remarks, he won't be now.


 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,105
16,016
136
Originally posted by: rise
Originally posted by: OcHungry
Originally posted by: Duvie


I have the backing of likely 98% of the ppl here...Who has your back?
You think so? You offend people in numerous occasions and you expect these members to support, because you're confident that they would.
I hope where you walk there wont be a puddle full of muddy water.
i don't like duvie's posting style and mark is useless imho.

however, duvie certainly contributes more than you do. say what you will about his abrasiveness but he knows what he talks about and backs it up with numbers. he's also no fanboy.

that said, calling out any member is wrong imo but if duvie hasn't been banned before for some of his remarks, he won't be now.

I am useless ? gee that is nice and comlimentary... And I didn;t post numbers ? and informations ? and a screen shot to prove I am right, and OChungry is wrong ? I think that you are the one being abrasive here.....(other than the obvious one)
 

rise

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2004
9,116
46
91
you're useless to me, thats why i said "imho". i'm sure you're useful to others and a great dad and all that. i was just stating "imho".
 

harpoon84

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2006
1,084
0
0
OcHungry... that's quite a corner you backed yourself into. Gonna be fun seeing how this one pans out.

I see that you've conveniently avoided the topic of performance altogether. Perhaps it doesn't matter anymore, or perhaps Duvie is *drum roll* LIEING?!?! LOL

For the record both Duvie and Mark have my full support. At least they contribute to this forum.

OcHungry on the other hand... well, just do a forum search under his username and decide for yourself. I suspect he is a key member of 'Team Sharikou'.