C/D; Carrera GT 0-60..3.5, 1/4mi..11.2sec@132mph

[JYDog]

C/D



ACCELERATION, Seconds
Zero to 30 mph: 1.5
40 mph: 2.0
50 mph: 2.9
60 mph: 3.5
70 mph: 4.1
80 mph: 4.7
90 mph: 5.9
100 mph: 6.8
110 mph: 7.8
120 mph: 9.4
130 mph: 10.8
Street start, 5-60 mph: 3.7
Top-gear acceleration, 30-50 mph: 4.3
50-70 mph: 4.8
Standing 1/4-mile: 11.2 sec @ 132 mph
Top speed (redline limited, mfr's est): 205 mph

1
2
3

 

[Goosemaster]

That thing would fly past me faster than it would take me to get a hard on:Q

 

[Goosemaster]

nevermind...that test cars paint job is fugly for such a nice car...the shade is all wrong..maybe the sunllight jsut screwed up the pictures...

 

[johnjbruin]

god damn we need a : Droooooooooool; and :cookie; pic for these forums.

 

[Nebor]

Now there's a car.

 

[0roo0roo]

nice but it looks like a nsx/mclaren

 

[Turkish]

Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
nice but it looks like a nsx/mclaren

lay off the crack my friend...

 

[JYDog]

Its just nipping on the heels of mclaren F1 with that 132mph 1/4mi.(vs. f1 135). Maybe with more revs allowed, it could get pass the mighty F1(the original 5.5 V-10 has a 10,000rpm rev limit). A 9400 rpm ceiling(on grand more) and 650hp would be so sweet, and a quick fix(well maybe not with stricter emissions). 😀

 

[Viper GTS]

60 mph: 3.5
Street start, 5-60 mph: 3.7

And that is what separates the truly fast from the wannabes.

Viper GTS

 

[MrScott81]

Originally posted by: Viper GTS
60 mph: 3.5
Street start, 5-60 mph: 3.7

And that is what separates the truly fast from the wannabes.

Viper GTS

exactly....this thing must have a grip of torque.

 

[Fausto]

Hehe...and for a little over $10,000 you can buy a motorcycle like the Hayabusa that will do this

 

[andylawcc]

http://www.fast-autos.net/gallery/carreragt/carreragt3

humm... Woodland Hills Auto,... I believe some ATers lived around that area.

 

[Aharami]

INTERIOR
SAE volume, front seat: 50 cu ft
luggage: 2 cu ft
Front-seat adjustments: fore-and-aft
Restraint systems, front: manual 3-point belts, driver and passenger front and side airbags

hehe found that funny!

awesome car!!
but i like the ford GT better..just cuz you dont expect ford to come out with such an awesome car!

 

[amcdonald]

This is an amazing car, without a doubt.
That being said, I'd never buy it.
I could do a lot better with $440k.

 

[andylawcc]

Originally posted by: amcdonald
This is an amazing car, without a doubt.
That being said, I'd never buy it.
I could do a lot better with $440k.

like buying 11 Lotus Elise in all the available colors ? 🙂

 

[amcdonald]

Originally posted by: andylawcc

Originally posted by: amcdonald
This is an amazing car, without a doubt.
That being said, I'd never buy it.
I could do a lot better with $440k.

like buying 11 Lotus Elise in all the available colors ? 🙂

Haha exactly.

 

[Rubicante]

like buying a ferrari and a house? or at least putting a massive down payment on a house... heh.

 

[CtK]

Originally posted by: Aharami

INTERIOR
SAE volume, front seat: 50 cu ft
luggage: 2 cu ft
Front-seat adjustments: fore-and-aft
Restraint systems, front: manual 3-point belts, driver and passenger front and side airbags

hehe found that funny!

awesome car!!
but i like the ford GT better..just cuz you dont expect ford to come out with such an awesome car!

i just dont trust ford for building me a supercar!!

 

[Eli]

Just such a car was designed back in 1939 but never built. Dubbed the Type 114, its two-seat coupe body strongly resembled the VW Beetle. It was no people's car, however, with a water-cooled 1.5-liter aluminum V-10

:Q

1.5L V10..... :Q

See.. that's what Honda needs to do. They need to produce a small, 3.0L V8 with VTEC and an 8,000RPM redline.

😀