- Oct 9, 1999
- 5,429
- 4,168
- 136
http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinions/sony-vaio-won-t-be-first-pc-industry-casualty
It was nice knowing you.
It was nice knowing you.
Sony stated that it is no longer designing and developing new products in the VAIO series, and confirmed that manufacturing and sales will wind down after the latest batch of notebooks go on sale globally.
It's kind of a shame because Sony did make a some good models. I think the biggest problem was the crazy number of models. It was hard to distinguish among them feature-wise. This should be a lesson to other manufacturers. Keep the naming and models simple and easy to understand. Limit the overlap, maximize manufacturing efficiency.
your current machine works more than fine for everything you want it to do.
Microsoft can't do anything about this--if they had made W8 just an improved version of W7, this would actually be more true, not less, and internal improvements to the OS (and there were many in 8) will actually prevent old hardware from going obsolete rather than hasten it. The only way for MS to make people need a new laptop is to bloat the OS ala Vista, or add new features. The first route is obviously stupid, and the second one seems to have floundered with 8 (at least in popular opinion and according to your post).
Sony killed their aspirations of a premium brand a long time ago with a sea of cruddy low end VAIOs. They should have done an Apple; have a handful of premium models, one aimed at each market niche, with top notch quality on every single one. But they joined in the mid-2000s race to the bottom and destroyed their brand, along with almost every other PC maker.
Everyone has at least one friend who's had a shitty Sony laptop that fell apart after a year. Same for Dell, Lenovo, Samsung, Toshiba, and HP. They're associated with garbage products. Intel's "Ultrabook" initiative was their attempt to turn this tide around, but it was hardly a resounding success.
IMO their biggest issue for most of their life was a price premium over competition without much indication of what (if anything) you were getting for the extra money.
IMO, that was the 2nd biggest issue...because I never actually bought one, or recommended anyone buy oneIMO their biggest issue for most of their life was a price premium over competition without much indication of what (if anything) you were getting for the extra money.
And, half of it is people being idiots. Many people will pay for quality, when the quality is apparent. Early expensive ultrabooks were lacking in quality for the money, and it took quite awhile for that to start fixing itself. Even today, thinner and lighter isn't going to get people paying all that much more, in large numbers.Sony killed their aspirations of a premium brand a long time ago with a sea of cruddy low end VAIOs. They should have done an Apple; have a handful of premium models, one aimed at each market niche, with top notch quality on every single one. But they joined in the mid-2000s race to the bottom and destroyed their brand, along with almost every other PC maker.
Everyone has at least one friend who's had a shitty Sony laptop that fell apart after a year. Same for Dell, Lenovo, Samsung, Toshiba, and HP. They're associated with garbage products. Intel's "Ultrabook" initiative was their attempt to turn this tide around, but it was hardly a resounding success.
IMO their biggest issue for most of their life was a price premium over competition without much indication of what (if anything) you were getting for the extra money.
