- Aug 4, 2000
- 31,108
- 2,721
- 126
http://blogs.forbes.com/kymmcnichol...to-increase-winning-chances/?partner=yahootix
If they want people to speculate in "the lottery", then why charge $10+ per month? If anything, it should be free. I do play the lottery, but I know playing more than a buck or two is stupid. And they want you to pay a monthly fee to top it off?
Why not just a service charge per ticket?
California residents dont have to drive down to the local liquor store or gas station for a chance to win millions in the California Lottery. They can now buy them online through Lottogopher.
Its a membership based model, just like Netflix. Members pay anywhere between $9.99 to $19.99 per month for the opportunity to buy Lottery tickets online, for the standard price of $1 per ticket. The membership fee pays for convenience and a users ability to play in office pool style groups of up to 100 tickets per drawing. Users can also join existing groups basically crowdsourcing the Lottery, in order to increase their chances of winning. Winnings are automatically credited to members accounts.
Its a long shot to win the lottery, so to pay a monthly fee to increase your chances of winning, you still have a greater chance of being struck by lightning than bringing home millions from a winning ticket. But I have to admit this is the direction the lottery is going and this company is at the forefront. Its only in California now, but its only a matter of time before other states lottery programs jump on the digital train.
If they want people to speculate in "the lottery", then why charge $10+ per month? If anything, it should be free. I do play the lottery, but I know playing more than a buck or two is stupid. And they want you to pay a monthly fee to top it off?
Last edited:
