FuriousGeorge
Junior Member
im gonna splurge because 1) computers are really my only healthy hobby and 2) because i use my computer for enough cpu intensive tasks that i feel i would see a significant performance to overall price benefeit (which is ubjective anyway i guess)
i use my pc to do some audio/video encoding/decoding, some video game playing, and there is always something going on in the background. whether i am using linux or windows i got the cpu-intensive eye candy turned up to the point it doesnt interefere with productivity (love alpha-shading hate windows "twirling" into minimized mode), and there are always file transfers and music playing going on. i wouldnt say i need a workstation but i am definately a "power user". plus i use gentoo linux so i spend a lot of time compiling from the source tree (i'm so cool!🙂
ive narrowed it down to the xeon vs the mp. until today i was under the impression that when you compared intels pr lable to amd's the athlons would be the overly optomistic chips. in other words i thought when comparing a xeon 2.2 to an mp 2200+ the former would stomp the latter. dont get me wrong, i am a huge amd fan, i currently run an xp 1600. then i saw benchmarks in an article on this site that showed that the mp was pr for pr stomping the xeon at a fraction (2/3) of the cost. now i want the mp 2800, but im torn.
pros: price, performance, my favorite brand
cons: no sata or pci-x support, probably ever, no agp 8x support, no options for chipset, basically a dead platform
i've heard that modern GPUs do most processing in the memory on board so there is only a small gain for 8x over 4x (but doom 3 is comming out)!
then i think about all the hype(rthreading) associated with the intel chips like 512 cache and the 533 fsb speeds and i think to myself that the xeon's cant really be slower than the mps and i havent found any benchmarks comparing the xeon 2.6 ghz (or so) to the 2800+ mp (which also has 512 cache but a 266 fsb)
i could always get a serial ata controller card or a scsi card and small hd just for my OSs
in the end i know that as soon as i but a board nvidia will release a chipset for the mp's which has everything i desire but that might be a chance i have to take. maybe i should just wait for some drivers and M$ Win XP 64 and get an opteron...
any input is appreciated
i use my pc to do some audio/video encoding/decoding, some video game playing, and there is always something going on in the background. whether i am using linux or windows i got the cpu-intensive eye candy turned up to the point it doesnt interefere with productivity (love alpha-shading hate windows "twirling" into minimized mode), and there are always file transfers and music playing going on. i wouldnt say i need a workstation but i am definately a "power user". plus i use gentoo linux so i spend a lot of time compiling from the source tree (i'm so cool!🙂
ive narrowed it down to the xeon vs the mp. until today i was under the impression that when you compared intels pr lable to amd's the athlons would be the overly optomistic chips. in other words i thought when comparing a xeon 2.2 to an mp 2200+ the former would stomp the latter. dont get me wrong, i am a huge amd fan, i currently run an xp 1600. then i saw benchmarks in an article on this site that showed that the mp was pr for pr stomping the xeon at a fraction (2/3) of the cost. now i want the mp 2800, but im torn.
pros: price, performance, my favorite brand
cons: no sata or pci-x support, probably ever, no agp 8x support, no options for chipset, basically a dead platform
i've heard that modern GPUs do most processing in the memory on board so there is only a small gain for 8x over 4x (but doom 3 is comming out)!
then i think about all the hype(rthreading) associated with the intel chips like 512 cache and the 533 fsb speeds and i think to myself that the xeon's cant really be slower than the mps and i havent found any benchmarks comparing the xeon 2.6 ghz (or so) to the 2800+ mp (which also has 512 cache but a 266 fsb)
i could always get a serial ata controller card or a scsi card and small hd just for my OSs
in the end i know that as soon as i but a board nvidia will release a chipset for the mp's which has everything i desire but that might be a chance i have to take. maybe i should just wait for some drivers and M$ Win XP 64 and get an opteron...
any input is appreciated