• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

buy the presidency for only 30 million ++?????

gigapet

Lifer
link

Bush Raising $27 Million, Outpacing All Democrats
By RICHARD W. STEVENSON


ASHINGTON, June 26 ? President Bush's re-election campaign expects to have raised $27 million to $30 million by the end of the month, most of it from a two-week burst of appearances that will conclude with receptions for the president in California on Friday and in Florida on Monday, a spokeswoman for the campaign said tonight.

The figure is sure to dwarf that reported by any of the nine Democratic presidential candidates when they release numbers on their fund-raising activities for the quarter ending June 30. In the first quarter, before Mr. Bush had his campaign up and running, none of the Democrats raised more than $7.4 million, and the entire Democratic field combined raised just over $28 million.

The decision by the Bush campaign to make public an estimate of its fund-raising total for the quarter illustrated the tactical importance of the money race in the early stages of the race for the White House.

Republican strategists said Mr. Bush had set out to raise a lot of money quickly, both to take advantage of his current postwar popularity and to try to dispirit his potential Democratic rivals and, perhaps more importantly, their financial backers. To the degree that Mr. Bush's fund-raising advantage adds to any perception that he will be very difficult to beat, the strategists said, it could lead Democratic donors to hesitate to contribute or to be reluctant to make the maximum individual donation of $2,000.

Determined to show that their campaigns are viable, many of the Democratic candidates have curtailed their travels in recent weeks to concentrate on calling potential donors in hopes of posting a strong showing when they release their second-quarter fund-raising figures.

The Bush campaign's estimate is at the high end of the $20 million to $30 million range that Republicans had set out when Mr. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and Laura Bush hit the fund-raising trail earlier this month.

It includes not only what came from the $2,000-a-ticket events at which they appeared, but also the proceeds from a mailing that went out to about one million donors and contributions that flowed in to the campaign's Web site.

The estimate includes donations expected from Mr. Bush's appearances on Friday in San Francisco and Los Angeles and from his appearances on Monday in Tampa, Fla., and Miami. It also includes the expected proceeds from Mr. Cheney's two scheduled events on Monday, in Akron, Ohio, and Grand Rapids, Mich.

 
Businesses like to get a return on their investment. Since Bush supports the execs who decide who to contribute to, it makes sense to pay for Bush to be re-elected. Unforunately, I cannot imagine Bush losing, regardless of what he does or what happens.
 
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Businesses like to get a return on their investment. Since Bush supports the execs who decide who to contribute to, it makes sense to pay for Bush to be re-elected. Unforunately, I cannot imagine Bush losing, regardless of what he does or what happens.

true .........

EDIT:

unless he doesnt listen to his bosses in which case they'll find a suitable replacement that knows how to take orders
 
Originally posted by: WhiteKnight
So you automatically assume that the fundraising will guarantee him a win?

Almost certainly. Look at the number of election wins and how they correlate to war chests.
 
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Originally posted by: WhiteKnight
So you automatically assume that the fundraising will guarantee him a win?

Almost certainly. Look at the number of election wins and how they correlate to war chests.



🙁

😱:brokenheart:

:|

Get out and vote people. Specially you young 'uns.
 
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Originally posted by: WhiteKnight
So you automatically assume that the fundraising will guarantee him a win?

Almost certainly. Look at the number of election wins and how they correlate to war chests.



🙁

😱:brokenheart:

:|

Get out and vote people. Specially you young 'uns.

Whats the point?
 

Don't be silly.

If EVERYONE in FL had voted, there wouldn't have been the controversey in the first place (probably).

Think about it.
 
Originally posted by: gigapet
link

Bush Raising $27 Million, Outpacing All Democrats
By RICHARD W. STEVENSON


ASHINGTON, June 26 ? President Bush's re-election campaign expects to have raised $27 million to $30 million by the end of the month, most of it from a two-week burst of appearances that will conclude with receptions for the president in California on Friday and in Florida on Monday, a spokeswoman for the campaign said tonight.

The figure is sure to dwarf that reported by any of the nine Democratic presidential candidates when they release numbers on their fund-raising activities for the quarter ending June 30. In the first quarter, before Mr. Bush had his campaign up and running, none of the Democrats raised more than $7.4 million, and the entire Democratic field combined raised just over $28 million.

The decision by the Bush campaign to make public an estimate of its fund-raising total for the quarter illustrated the tactical importance of the money race in the early stages of the race for the White House.

Republican strategists said Mr. Bush had set out to raise a lot of money quickly, both to take advantage of his current postwar popularity and to try to dispirit his potential Democratic rivals and, perhaps more importantly, their financial backers. To the degree that Mr. Bush's fund-raising advantage adds to any perception that he will be very difficult to beat, the strategists said, it could lead Democratic donors to hesitate to contribute or to be reluctant to make the maximum individual donation of $2,000.

Determined to show that their campaigns are viable, many of the Democratic candidates have curtailed their travels in recent weeks to concentrate on calling potential donors in hopes of posting a strong showing when they release their second-quarter fund-raising figures.

The Bush campaign's estimate is at the high end of the $20 million to $30 million range that Republicans had set out when Mr. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and Laura Bush hit the fund-raising trail earlier this month.

It includes not only what came from the $2,000-a-ticket events at which they appeared, but also the proceeds from a mailing that went out to about one million donors and contributions that flowed in to the campaign's Web site.

The estimate includes donations expected from Mr. Bush's appearances on Friday in San Francisco and Los Angeles and from his appearances on Monday in Tampa, Fla., and Miami. It also includes the expected proceeds from Mr. Cheney's two scheduled events on Monday, in Akron, Ohio, and Grand Rapids, Mich.

Of course his opponent(s) will run a "people's campaign" on a shoestring budget.
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: djheater
Don't be silly.

If EVERYONE in FL had voted, there wouldn't have been the controversey in the first place (probably).

Think about it.

That being said.....

the president is not chosen by the general public anyway. changes in authority are decided behind closed doors in conference rooms neither you nor I know about.

The president is a puppet regardless of who is elected. If he doesnt play puppet according to the rules he gets removed from office one way or another.
 
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: djheater
Don't be silly.

If EVERYONE in FL had voted, there wouldn't have been the controversey in the first place (probably).

Think about it.

That being said.....

the president is not chosen by the general public anyway. changes in authority are decided behind closed doors in conference rooms neither you nor I know about.

The president is a puppet regardless of who is elected. If he doesnt play puppet according to the rules he gets removed from office one way or another.

All of the above taken as true. Is this a reason not to vote?

It's not for me. Futility does not justify inaction.

 
Originally posted by: djheater
Don't be silly.

If EVERYONE in FL had voted, there wouldn't have been the controversey in the first place (probably).

Think about it.

Yeah and we'd been left with Gore, the guy who created the Interweb!!! I'm sure he'd done as good a job as Bush did during a time of conflict/war. 😱

 
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: djheater
Don't be silly.

If EVERYONE in FL had voted, there wouldn't have been the controversey in the first place (probably).

Think about it.

Yeah and we'd been left with Gore, the guy who created the Interweb!!! I'm sure he'd done as good a job as Bush did during a time of conflict/war. 😱


What did bush do ...........from what I saw he made a couple speeches shook a few hands. I'm sure gore could have stepped up to that responsibility.

Perhaps gore might not have event started a war.......but thats just getting to deep into what ifs
 
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: djheater
Don't be silly.

If EVERYONE in FL had voted, there wouldn't have been the controversey in the first place (probably).

Think about it.

Yeah and we'd been left with Gore, the guy who created the Interweb!!! I'm sure he'd done as good a job as Bush did during a time of conflict/war. 😱

But then, would Gore attack everyone at random just to draw attention away from Bin Laden and Al Qaida, or would have gone after them instead?
 
Originally posted by: Drekce
I am going to get out and vote...for Bush again. He has been the best president since Regan.

Indeed he has. He got my vote the first time around and he'll get it the second time as well.
 
Originally posted by: djheater
Don't be silly.

If EVERYONE in FL had voted, there wouldn't have been the controversey in the first place (probably).

Think about it.

Yea, Bush would have had even more votes so nobody could whine about the "what-if".
 
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: djheater
Don't be silly.

If EVERYONE in FL had voted, there wouldn't have been the controversey in the first place (probably).

Think about it.

Yeah and we'd been left with Gore, the guy who created the Interweb!!! I'm sure he'd done as good a job as Bush did during a time of conflict/war. 😱


What did bush do ...........from what I saw he made a couple speeches shook a few hands. I'm sure gore could have stepped up to that responsibility.

Perhaps gore might not have event started a war.......but thats just getting to deep into what ifs
Right, Bush arranged for the planes to be flown into the towers...
 
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Originally posted by: WhiteKnight
So you automatically assume that the fundraising will guarantee him a win?

Almost certainly. Look at the number of election wins and how they correlate to war chests.

It worked for Kennedy, didn't it? He had his father's wealth backing him up. Of course, the Mob did play a part in getting him elected, especially in Illinois.
 
Back
Top